Agnostic.com

4 5

LINK Can these massive bricks solve storage for renewable energy?

grid sized batteries is currently the biggest obstacles to switching grids completely to renewable energy (wind & solar). There are many solutions out there. This is a very intresting one

These giant towers use a very low-tech solution to store energy created when the sun shines or the wind blows so it can be used later.

It’s already cheaper to build a new solar or wind farm than a coal plant. But when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing, renewable electricity can still be fairly expensive to store–even though the cost of batteries is dropping. If the world shifted to 100% renewable electricity right now, we might pay more on electric bills.

A new solution that uses basic physics could cut the cost of storage in half, or by as much as 80% over the total life of the system. It makes it possible for renewable power to be cheaper than fossil fuels all day, every day of the year, everywhere. “Our solution, for the first time, will enable the world to achieve this,” says Robert Piconi, CEO and cofounder of Energy Vault, the startup that developed the new system. Tata Power, the giant Indian electric utility, will be the first customer.

Energy Vault, based in California and Switzerland, took inspiration from the way that some dams store energy–hydro plants pump water uphill when energy demand is low, and then produce energy by turning turbines as the water flows back down. The system works, but only in places where dams can physically be built; dams also harm fish, force people to relocate, and can burst and flood villages.

Like dams, the new solution–a massive tower, roughly the height of a 35-story building–relies on gravity. But it doesn’t require water. When a wind or solar farm makes more energy than the grid needs, an automatic crane on the battery uses the extra electricity to lift a giant brick, weighing 35 metric tons, up to the top of the tower. “When that tower’s stacked, that’s all potential energy,” says Piconi. When the grid needs power, the crane automatically lowers a brick, using the kinetic energy to charge a generator.

All of this happens almost immediately. “We can have a millisecond response time,” he says. The system’s software takes signals from the grid to automatically control the cranes, which carefully raise and lower the giant bricks while taking into account wind and weather. The cranes lower the bricks at exactly the speed needed to provide electricity continuously.

It’s cheaper than building giant lithium-ion batteries, like the huge batteries that Tesla has installed in Australia and elsewhere. In part, that’s because the bricks can be made from cement that would normally be wasted. “These materials we’re using are actually materials that you’d have to landfill,” says Piconi. In California, for example, a construction site with concrete debris has to pay as much as $55 a cubic yard to get rid of it. Unlike lithium batteries, building the system doesn’t require a specialized multimillion-dollar factory; the autonomous crane comes from another manufacturer. Mining lithium also uses huge amounts of water and risks toxic leaks.

In a small town near its headquarters in Switzerland, Energy Vault built a small prototype of the device–72 feet tall, instead of the usual 393. (The system also works at a small scale, but the company is focused on the largest market, utility-scale customers; it’s also less efficient and less disruptive in terms of cost at a smaller scale.) The company is now beginning to build its first units for customers around the world. It’s also in talks with some customers who have been considering constructing huge new dams. “We can do that at a quarter of the cost, without the environmental problems, and have something that would deliver more on the performance side,” says Piconi.

The solution can scale up quickly. “We don’t need to rely on manufacturing or large investments,” he says. It’s a needed step as more states and countries move toward 100% renewable electricity.

Lukian 8 Nov 8
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Why does the weight have to be in a building why not in a hole?
And does anyone have any points of reference of the cost of going fully renewable energy. (Energy density vs return on energy for manufacturing equipment.

like this?

1

Interesting concept, but sounds very cumbersome.

cumbersome? in what way? this structure would be like a 10-40 story building in the middle of a wind turbine farm.

@Lukian A 10 - 40 story building is quite cumbersome.

@nvrnuff maybe I don't interpret the term cumbersome in the same way. A building like structure in an otherwise empty field does not equate to cumbersome to me. Considering that the only other alternative to this technology is to place a pond on top of a mountain, pump water up during the day and turn turbines at night. That feat of construction is cumbersome since it requires specific geological features. (I'm sorry for my pushy explanation but this is a subject I have been reading up on for several years and am passionate about to a fault)

@Lukian I live in an area that has a LOT of wind turbines. While I support renewables, it surely is not a pretty site and the structures we're talking about here definately would not help that aspect.

@nvrnuff got it!

@Lukian From an engineering standpoint, I think it's brilliant.

3

An interesting concept with the benefit of being simplistic which is usually best in the real world. Another concept which is gaining traction is Molten Salt Batteries for grid storage, also simplistic and affordable; anything we can do to improve efficiency and reduce environmental impact is a good thing.

I think you can't get more simplistic on this idea: cranes, motor/generators, heavy bricks. I like this idea. Molten Salt is very corrosive and the technology needs more testing.

@Lukian true enough about the molten salt but there is an inefficiency with recovering the energy that is stored, both in the motors needed to lift the weight and in the conversion of the energy through the generators. Nothing is perfect but we continue to improve and that's what counts. 👍

1

I wonder what the efficiency is?
Was listening to a podcast going thru the different methods of storing energy and pumping water (up a hill) had one of best efficiencies (when including infrastructure)

Cool idea.

I think efficiencies is less relevant with such simplistic technology. Probably the whole process can be automated with a drone like algorithm.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:218390
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.