Fire insurance for the sake of fire insurance???? If there were really a god, wouldn't "he" (in his omniscience) know that the person's true intention was to save their own ass? Chances are they burn in hell forever... lol hahahaha
This is the worst argument in the case for god- much worse than the argument from design, which makes sense to a certain extent, though ultimately flawed. So you believe because if god is real, and you didn't believe in him you'll be doomed, so better to believe in god to avoid punishment, just in case. That's so tawdry and fake that I think it makes a better argument against god.
It's a misleading idea and one that promotes immortality as a sort of insurance policy. It is about taking the easy way (this is what religion is about after all) instead of a true, reasoned stance. It's for weak robots.
A disgusting and immoral bet .
Narcissistic as ****
What is narcissistic ? My comment or the bet ? please
Fuck Pascal's wager. It's all about Ricky's Challenge...
Pascal’s wager is BS because even if you chose to believe in a god to hedge your bets, which god is the one true god? None of them. Atheists 1,000,000 - Theists 0.
Yes, the application of psychological research vs the indoctrination teachings of supposed preachers.
I try to maximize the number of gods that I believe in that don't have a "one God only" policy. I'm hoping these gods can protect me from the more pissy gods.
It's a reasonable way to introduce the idea of expected value. There's nothing wrong with the mathematical side of his Pascal's idea. We just don't agree on the parameters.
I voted "Not BS" because I can only believe that the proposal was intended to (a) be ironic, have the irony slip right past most of the people hearing it, and be something to chew over for anyone who got it. Pascal's time was right in the crossover of fervent true belief getting shoved aside by reason.
I concur with the logic you have given. Yet, some of the destruction of the library of Alexandria could also account for the psychology of giving and or hiding and I am going to do anything to keep it going. Remember, the Catholic organization only apologized to Galileo in 1992.
Interesting proposal; but the argument itself, as proposed by people who actually take it seriously, is bullshit.