I agree but I used the word "mirrored" to imply not an exact copy using humans but one that used the concept of a garden and flood ect. Maybe I could have worded it better.

All a mirrored product would imply is that they were growing in a similar way to humans at that time. You can't just point to 2 books being similar and say their is you evidence. Besides the bible was not the first human crated story, and it was not the last. Atop of that the simple law of averages dictates their would be a similar book some were in the universe. The simple fact is we have to little knowledge of how culture develops, and with earth being the only sample we have right now you can't make the jump to say ah this book is similar to this one this is right. you need more data to draw that conclusion.

LOL, yes they do. Whenever I stay at a motel or hotel, I hide the bible in the room. I"ll put it in the microwave or the refrigerator or under the bed (if possible) or under the couch. Anywhere that would make it more unlikely to be found. Just my way of making a statement--sort of. LOL

Darco, I'm baffled. I'm not trying to be defensive, and I hope you are not insulted but what are you talking about, perhaps it's just me not fully understanding you? Are you saying I'm assuming in my fictional example of what if a bible was found on another planet that had the scientific capabilities of Earth 2000 years ago? OR are you saying we would need to assume too much to be able to conclude any supernatural deity, based on this evidence?

Your radio comment is confusing too. It is true that in 1895 Guglielmo Marconi: an Italian inventor created the first radio, but I don't know what that has to do with my statement. It almost seems like a red herring since it actually only serves to divert the thought experiment I was purposing.
Finally, I don't know what "being" you're talking about nor do I understand why you would think the chances would be high for this being to have a copy of any Bible. I never spoke about the Christian King James Bible. If you would clear this up that would be appreciated. The only conclusion I can make is that you were talking to someone else but responded to me but I looked through the comments and I saw nothing that matched up

The Bible when capitalized is (for most westerners) taken to mean the KJV or some version of that. 2000 years ago (or the start of the common era) we didn't have a bible either. In fact, writing was pretty limited until relatively recently. The books of the bible are largely passed down verbally and are subject to heavy editing but I'm sure you know that and it's academic to your experiment.

I understand how you're proposing your thought experiment but you've already covered the radio in the fact that you're saying 2kya.

Hence your thought experiment (and there's nothing wrong with the proposal) could be more easily framed by fast forwarding to the late 18th century. We had the printing press, many more people could read - although most could not until perhaps the early part of the 20th.

That's why I didn't fully understand your thought experiment (and Marconi was only developing Hertz's work, but again this is academic.)

I'm not easily insulted unless people call me names or use lame fallacies, weasel words and such. I assure you that my remarks are no more intended to cause you offense than they are to expand the discussion.

I'm aware of these facts, I know how the Bible was constructed, why it was constructed, how scriptures were accepted and rejected within the canon of the Bible. All that is interesting but it doesn't really address the question I posed. Your criticism is welcomed but in this case, I feel as if you might be missing my intent which was setting a stage where these aliens could not have been influenced by us through technology. I was asking what else could explain a mirror image of the Bible on an alien world?