You can't- not satisfactorily, anyway. If biology is the study of life, then what would be more fundamental than learning about how life got here in the first place, and why it is the way it is today (in other words, evolution)? You COULD teach biology without evolution, but it would be so much more meaningless.

This is one of my real bugbears. I once told a creationist that not discussing evolution in a classroom is equivalent to child abuse. It didn't go down well, but it certainly made them think! I've learned to be more subtle recently

same way they print newspapers : lies and omissions

Why would you want to? If a "teacher" panders to biased pressure they are doing the students a grave disservice. If you do it to keep your job, you need a different job.

You explain that there must be a creator, because life can't just spontaneously appear from nothing, but somehow God just appeared which destroys that argument.
Then you ask the students to either write a 1000 word essay on the scientific basis for God just always existing, or a 100 to 500 word essay on how life came to be.

You can just describe characteristics, physiology, and behavior without discussing genetic relatedness, and speak of natural selection as a relationship between genetics and environment. Basically just leave out the "all life is part of the same family tree" part of it.

Biology can't be taught without including evolution, because evolution works. When biologists work with developing new strains of life forms, they are using the principles of evolution so in order to teach a student who wishes to work in this way it is essential.