Agnostic.com

1 2

LINK Death v. Religion at the Supreme Court - Religion News Service

FTA: States committed to conducting executions would do well to enable those who are about to die to be accompanied by the spiritual adviser of their choice.

In the meantime, the priorities of the Supreme Court’s newly strengthened conservative wing have become a bit clearer. For Roberts, Alito, and Kavanaugh, the country’s religious rules of the road matter more than they do for Gorsuch and Thomas, whose enthusiasm for the death penalty, it seems, knows no spiritual bounds.

zblaze 7 Apr 11
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

4

And yet, with such enthusiasm for putting adults to death, the Right still refuses to countenance even a morning-after pill to prevent conception. This is what "pro-life" means to them; pro-life up until you leave the womb, and then we'll execute you as we please.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:329116
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.