Just for the record... I am a naturist. I think laws that prohibit nudity are a vilation of freedom of expression (speech).
In this particular case the issue is whether or nto women shoudl have the same topless rights as men. I dotn' see why they shoudl not.
Bizarre choice of defense for a situation where the offline equivalent is that a peeping tom student spied on a private moment between a teacher and her boyfriend.
But then again sacking that teacher is a bizarre reaction to that scenario. Can't help wondering what we're missing here.
There are missing parts, for sure! Is the school administration predominantly Catholic?