I don't know about SARS, but information on the web suggests there was some level of human testing to assess the biochemical effects of plutonium or uranium.
[bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu]
[ehss.energy.gov]
[atomicheritage.org]

My ex's cousin used to tell us things he had done like hunting alligators in Florida canals wearing a swimsuit, snorkel & armed with a Bowie knife....yeah, okay Jimmy.......

Did he have permanent lung injury? Struggle with any basic activity where you would need to breath harder? Testing a service member doesn't seem to make sense in my mind either. Were you able to confirm other aspects of the man's story about being a Seal? You seem to have more of a vague memory, so I would not know how you would remember more specific details I am asking and therefore could probably not confirm for yourself.

I am doubtful of his claim. First, was he even a Seal? They are an expensive asset given the amount of training, and low throughput of those who sign up for the program compared to the number who actually earn the right to be a Seal. If he was, good for him. But beware of the wanna-be's. Given his SARS tale, skepticism is warranted.

I agree that many gov'ts see servicemen as handy test subjects and fail to tell them the risks but I'm sceptical as to whether you can be infected repeatedly with SARS. I'd have thought surviving one infection would confer immunity or at least invalidate the results of subsequent experiments.

Once a sailor always a sailor....he told you the truth all of us were injected huge syringes full in my Navy trained to stay clean and healthy.....take your selenium zinc vit c all Bs eat mushrooms and miso and you will be safe but stay the fuck away from 5 G towers AND REFUSE ALL FUTURE vax

I'm having a hard time believing this one. First of all, why would they use a Navy Seal? They would use a convict. And why tell the subject what he's getting? They would use some code.