Seems like a pretty weak argument spoken in unappealing bureaucratese.
The stilted language serves to both legitimize AND obscure the apparent appeal for more diverse inputs, a different relationship between man and the rest of the ecosystem, a generally healthier world through a more holistic approach...
Are they proposing NOT developing tests, quarantines, and vaccines?
Calling for a new societal paradigm, a restructuring of institutions to make them less elitist and more democratic, only means something if specific strategies are proposed. How does all this nattering translate into new approaches, policies, and remedial actions?
This is all very vague and, as I said, obscure. Give me a real, concrete plan.