Agnostic.com

2 1

Is Portland NEXT? This would be great if Portland take the initiative.
[A Massachusetts City Decides to Recognize Polyamorous Relationships
](http:
[nytimes.com]polyamorous-domestic-partnership.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes//)

Humanlove 7 July 1
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

Polyamorous? Why can't they just let people set up as a group for benefits and health insurance. For their sexual status to get into it is ridiculous. Just let a single person designate a friend or non-spousal family member. If we had Medicare for all, people wouldn't have to jump through hoops just to be covered.

3

"I don’t think it’s the place of the government to tell people what is or is not a family,” Mr. Davis, who is a lawyer, said at a meeting last week. “Defining families is something that historically we’ve gotten quite wrong as a society, and we ought not to continue to try and undertake to do so.”

. . . that is seriously woke

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:511371
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.