Wait a second... The New York Times said this???? 
So back then it was an issue to the left wing liberal wrag,, but not now? That's just so damn typical.. [nytimes.com]
1
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
3 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.
. . . article is (almost) EIGHT YEARS OLD. 
FearlessFly
Level 9
Aug 5, 2020
0
. . . and there was NO pandemic !
. . . and five states have done it for years.
The number ultimately rejected or fraudulent in a major election is still statistically not significant. The good thing with all the recent uproar, states are reviewing their mail-in policies and procedures. In doing so, many of the catchpoints will be addressed ahead of time, some will not.
The election is a very complex concept and multi-faceted procedure. There will always be problems, points of contention, and errors. In general, our elections are the most fair and even-handed in the world. If you really want address the concept of one person, one vote, take on the voter suppression laws in the South. That would really be a fight worth addressing. Not mail-in voting.
t1nick
Level 8
Aug 4, 2020
3
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.