so, i don't wanna put too fine a point on this since most atheists are in denial on it imo, but a non-believer is surely just a believer in non, and nothing wrong with that imo except that neither one is a genuine agnostic, which actually has nothing to do with whether someone “doesnt know whether there is a god or not,” since that describes everyone, right? No one knows that, i don't think?

so point being that you might seek another definition for “agnostic,” perhaps the site definition, wherein it might be understood that a-gnostic is really “against gnosticism,” and that an agnostic is not even trying to “know” what, essentially, cannot be known.

in reply to your q i followed…more like stumbled i guess, through skado’s path, although i obviously lost some ground somewhere along the line, prolly drugs

this is a fact free post, and everything i say is a lie

Living in reality, as I see and interpret it.

Actually everyone is agnostic Nobody can prove that there is a God No matter how hard I tried to be a believer or atheist I always ended up being an agnostic

Somebody may say to me but who created the universe ? I may say a God did but I can not prove that a God still exist today

Just for a tip, since God is not here then let us be childless and vegan because of overpopulation and pains

Facts

I heard so many preachers interpreting the Bible in so many conflicting ways that I decided I needed to read it and lean on my own understanding of it. That's all it took.

the backstabbing ppl of faith