Agnostic.com

3 5

LINK Texas' Abortion Law Is Not Just Oppressive, It's Hypocritical - Honolulu Civil Beat

Planned Parenthood on Beretania Street in Honolulu.


By Alani Bagcal -- September 16, 2021 -- 5 min read


"How can people who refuse a vaccine by crying "my body, my choice" justify ripping away a woman's right to decide whether she wants to bear a child?"


" “My Body, My Choice” is a phrase embodied by the movement that has led my political career and empowers me to make safe and informed decisions about my body and life. I am a woman on a mission to ensure that a person’s choice is trusted, respected and heard to obtain self-determination."


"The issue has always been the right to make decisions about one’s body based on the best interests of one’s life and one’s life only. This phrase has always meant the right to consent to sex, pregnancy and childbirth and to access medically accurate information and the wide range of reproductive health services — without violence, discrimination and government interference or repercussion." "


" "Heedlessly, this phrase has been conflated with two completely different issues. People who do not advocate for abortion and other reproductive rights legislation are declaring “my body, my choice” as if their choice to refuse vaccination, mask-wearing and taking the precautions needed to protect our community from the Covid-19 pandemic is oppression and unconstitutional."


"Anti-reproductive rights politicians are using the phrase as a shield to spread misinformation and to feed on the public fear of “tyrannizing efforts to violate personal liberty” with safety mandates while they continue to openly oppose and vote against equitable reproductive health care access."


"Last week Texas passed SB8, the most restrictive abortion ban in the nation. It bans abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, which is well before many women even know they are pregnant. The law allows private citizens to sue abortion providers and anyone else who helps a person obtain an abortion, including those who give a woman a ride to a clinic or provide them financial assistance."


"Citizens who bring these suits don’t need to show any connection to those they are suing, and the law actually incentivizes them to sue, with the prospect of $10,000 if they win their case."


"There are no exceptions for rape or incest."


"The Supreme Court of the United States made no attempt to block this law, causing the greatest threat to the landmark decision Roe v. Wade, which is protected by the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, who has banned mask and vaccine mandates in honor of “personal choice,” celebrates a win when policy directly attacks a woman’s decision to bear and raise a child, without any regard for how that might affect them physically, emotionally and financially."


"Marginalized communities continue to suffer the most from these laws."


"Abbott is not alone in the epitome of false solidarity with “the right to make one’s own personal medical decisions.” He hypocritically hides behind this phrase and contributes to the spread of Covid-19."


I’ve seen that rhetoric right here in Hawaii."


" "I am not a medical doctor, but I am an organizer who successfully led action to pass Act 3 last April, greatly expanding access to equitable abortion care in Hawaii for those who need it." "


"The greatest thing I’ve learned about being a lobbyist is to listen to those who are immersed in the experience, study and work of an issue. They are the experts and in order to effectively move forward, we need to make space to learn from them and follow their lead."


"Medical experts have reiterated time and again that the vaccine alone is not the answer but to consistently follow all of the general safety precautions. Ambivalence about the vaccine is okay and people are allowed to feel different ways about things, but that doesn’t discard the consequences of people’s inaction to help mitigate the spread and number of current hospitalizations."


"For reference, reproductive rights activists will never tell you how to feel about abortion. The point of their advocacy is that no matter how you feel about it, if someone getting an abortion doesn’t have an effect on your life, you have no right to control their decision to get an abortion."


"Covid-19, on the other hand, is a highly transmissible and deadly virus that has altered all of our lives whether we have contracted it or not. Medical experts have proven vaccination is effective at reducing severe symptoms, thus lowering hospitalizations, relieving clinician burnout and so on. The experts’ informed plea to the public is that we must take initiative now before things get worse — because they will get worse if we do not take accountability for how our actions affect other peoples’ safety and lives."


"Be aware that these two situations are not interchangeable. It’s not “My Body, My Choice” if that choice harms other people. Personal decisions that have public repercussions are public health issues that require collective action."


"Everyone’s personal choice to take the recommended safety precautions is imperative for the eradication or alleviation of Covid-19."


"Everyone’s personal choice in family planning is their own."

AnonySchmoose 8 Sep 18
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I pisses me off that the rabidly anti-vaxxers have usurped the Womens Battle Cry of the 70's, we need to reclaim it.It was always about fighting back against Patriarcy and Male Doctors dismissive attitude towards our medical concerns. Most importantly it was a fight for our Individual choices surrounding our medical choices. Not killing others through selfish inaction.

That slogan usurpation disturbs me too, as does the Supreme Court's lack of defense of women's constitutional rights from state interference. It is like some of them have already decided to overturn Roe v. Wade.

However, though I'm no legal scholar... In the 14th Amendment, "the Privileges or Immunities Clause prohibits states from interfering only with privileges and immunities possessed by virtue of national citizenship... In Saenz v. Roe (1999), the Court ruled that a component of the "right to travel" is protected by the Privileges or Immunities Clause...

The Equal Protection Clause was created largely in response to the lack of equal protection provided by law in states with Black Codes... it denied to any State the power to withhold from them the equal protection of the laws, and authorized Congress to enforce its provisions by appropriate legislation.... " [en.wikipedia.org]

When rich white women can get abortions and safe reproductive medical care in Texas, while people of color living on limited incomes cannot, then the 14th Amendment is not being upheld as it should be by the Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress.

1

Bill Maher was taking last night about how we need to get past the sentiment that the other political party is an existential threat and we wouldn't be sad if they all died. I agree it's a problem, but being one of the people he was describing, I think the implied solution of compromising with the other side is impossible. How do you compromise with people who think the state should own women's bodies or black people shouldn't be allowed to vote? Any such compromise would invariably be sacrificing, at least in part, rights, freedoms, and personhood.

Yes... I agree polarization is a major American problem. And I agree that personhood is threatened by legally withholding abortion and voting freedoms. There is very little on which compromise will help abortion and voting freedoms.

1

It's a attack on women

bobwjr Level 10 Sep 18, 2021

The Texas law really offends me in that rape and incest are not horrible enough to allow for an abortion. The law forces each women to live with those traumas to her body and her future forever.

@AnonySchmoose I see where you're coming from on this, and those are really horrible things to do to a woman, but to be honest, it offends me that anyone would/could tell a woman she couldn't have an abortion even if her only reason was that she didn't want stretch marks or that she didn't like the father. Either a blastocyst/zygote/fetus/etc. has a claim to the host's body, or it doesn't, after you decide where you stand on that, nothing else should matter.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:623077
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.