Agnostic.com

3 7

[huffpost.com]
Supreme Court rejects jerrymandering case in NC and PA

Organist1 8 Mar 7
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

In this case, we can cheer.

A lower court had rejected a GOP gerrymander as racist. The GOP appealed and SCOTUS refused to hear the appeal.

0

The "right" to vote blueRed or redBlue continues....duopoly prevents open choices to all candidates which is real voter rights ....voters should vote PRINCIPLES rather than the delusion of picking a winner from 2 colluding parties

1

something needs to be done about this jerrymandering. Perhaps a bi-partisan commission in each state to draw the maps?

They would never agree.

It needs to be handed off to a computer program.

@Organist1 Yup. They couldn’t agree in NY

@racocn8 let me program it.

States are gradually changing to independent commissions. Too gradually IMO.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:654532
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.