Agnostic.com

1 4

LINK The Supreme Court confronts its most dishonest anti-worker decision - Vox

Laws mean nothing if they cannot be enforced against people who violate them, which is why there is an entire branch of government — the judiciary — whose job is supposed to be applying the law to individual cases. But at least when it comes to employment law, the Supreme Court has spent the last two decades permitting most employers to immunize themselves from lawsuits through a practice known as “forced arbitration.”

Forced arbitration allows an employer to order its workers to sign away their right to sue the company, or lose their jobs. Instead, any disputes must be resolved in a private arbitration process that gives extraordinary advantages to corporate parties over individuals. (Forced arbitration is also very common in ordinary consumer transactions, but your bank or cellphone company can only refuse to do business with you if you refuse arbitration. Your boss can most likely fire you.)

In the final two weeks of March, the Supreme Court will hear three cases asking just how much power companies have to force their workers into arbitration.

(With a conservative majority, I think the corporations will win, because conservatives ALWAYS values profits before people.)

snytiger6 9 Mar 14
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

SCOTUS history, under Roberts, would fall in favor of corporations. “Land of the free” but without Rights.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:655684
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.