Agnostic.com

2 1

The theoretical, non-experimental physicist AE may be in trouble.

Early in the 19th century, the Scottish botanist Robert Brown dropped grains of pollen into water and observed “a kind of jittery motion”. ....”Physicists ... no satisfying answer emerged.”

AE’s explanation rested “on an ever-present internal energy ... reflected as temperature”.

Physicists were skeptical over “questionable theoretical leaps”.

The Theory fails to match modern observations in at least three scenarios:

  • when salt is added to the water,
  • When particle concentrations are relatively high, and
  • when a light is turned on.
    Source: The Fourth Phase of Water by Gerald H. Pollack
yvilletom 8 May 24
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Quack theory, been around a decade or more, nothing has come of it.

1

It is good to look back on how understanding developes. I am sure I would have made the same objections.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:667936
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.