What he has in an agenda is what I see.

Well I did an Amazon search. While that particular shirt isn't there, there are other violent types and rhetoric types of negativity available. That would promote a sense of political divide. In other words, styled towards conditioning. This doesn't mean the shirt in the video was never there. And it doesn't mean someone placed these shirts on the site and they sold out being you can sell your own stuff on the site. And it doesn't mean that Gateway Pundit didn't purposely create a misleading photo using a site to create meme's to incite a false narrative towards misinformation. GP after all is a far right extremist information site that is highly questionable.

I wish the content and sources would have been more imperative towards controlling the direction of the debate here. Which I believe both of you allowed yourselves to be hoodwinked into a confrontation by what is obviously a right wing supporter with a biased agenda. This could have/has turned into a great example of how distraction is caused by biased content driven by agenda to divide us. In which after spending a good deal of time researching all the links provided, as far as news goes, lead me to republican sources that suggest obvious agenda driven purposes. Which is fine if you're a republican being it fits their managed perception. And this is most likely self generated mis/disinformation, even if true though, seemingly accomplished its agenda by turning you 2 against each other in a negative tone.

While the video provides a sense of truth within the political arena within party biasness that occurs from both sides of the 2 party political spectrum, it also provides a sense of deceptive righteousness and distraction from the real issues. Which is, both sides are capable of doing anything to distracts us from the real issues. And that we have been so well conditioned that many do it without realizing it for the sake of partisanship that continues to diminish our society.

As replied to you previously Jeff:

Seriously Jeff. Why do you think your fellow American in his vlog brought the issue up & provided you with evidence? Supposing he screenshot the advert for the last in stock item. Perhaps you bought it & on dispatch the advert is automatically removed. Your search now does not prove that the item did not appear in the advert at the time that he claims to have seen it.
Methinks you are frothing at the mouth too much because, like the naked emperor, you have been exposed.
The claims made by the vlogger are supported.
@JeffMurray proclaims my post to be a "sack of lies". So I responded to him with "Hey Jeff you didn't look far did you? What went wrong were you blinded by the steam out of your ears or the mucus bubbling from your eyes, nose & mouth?"

[lifenews.com] "

And now add this -

[redbubble.com]
[2020trendingtees.com]

Perhaps we should not rely on Google for our information?

@JeffMurray how studiously you ignore that incitement that I mention of weapons for sale. Setting my enquiry to be wordwide here are the first few returns from the search just now. I note that Amazon is heavily featured. I suggest that the problem is systemic.