White Supremacy, Nazism and Fascism R U.S.

Only the United States and Ukraine voted against a UN Resolution denouncing the "glorification of Nazism." History proves that racism in all its forms is foundational to this country and continues to be affirmed.

Writing these words during the Thanksgiving “celebration” is sadly ironic as it illustrates the contradictions of a culture that has yet to reconcile itself with its colonial and white supremacist ideologies, past and present. Despite many criticisms, white supremacy remains not only well and strong, but is also recognized and hailed by the United States on the world stage as an acceptable and legitimate ideology.

[blackagendareport.com]

{Although the United States claims to condemn “the glorification of Nazism and all forms of racism, xenophobia, discrimination and intolerance,” it has repeatedly refused to vote for the resolution. It does so because, according to the U.S. Mission to the UN, this resolution would legitimize the Russian “disinformation campaign” and supposedly justify using the fight against Nazi glorification and turn it against Russia’s neighboring countries. For the United States, the struggle against fascism could be used by Russia against certain entities, national or otherwise, and consequently, for the U.S. Mission to discourage other nations “from invoking Article 4 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and Article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in order to either silence unwelcome opinions or to excuse their failure to combat intolerance.”}

A disinformation campaign that has never been proven. Quite frankly, debunked on many levels.

You mean for instance, Ukraine? Where the US funded and organized a fascist coup to take over Ukraine in 2014. Already one of the most leaning fascist nations on the planet as it is. Lead by none other than our current president Joe Biden. With the help of Victoria Nuland, John Kerry, John McCain, Chris Murphy, and others. In which that government then went on a genocide campaign in Eastern Ukraine against Russian speaking citizens of a different Christian faith on the border of Russia. Also had intentions of invading Crimea for the same reasoning. A Nazi battalion within which was in possession of the only type of rocket launcher to fire a certain type of missile that most likely shot down an airliner, which the Russian government just happen to be blamed for.

Putin has already exposed these rightful opinions in certain degrees, you just have to find video of him doing it. Our MSCM aren't allowed to. If you follow the right news sources you can come to these same conclusions on your own. The facts fall in place with relative ease. When our governments do it to other nations it's acceptable. When Putin or his cabinet do it it's interference and or mis/disinformation. Look only towards our own MSCM for the real mis/disinformation campaigns taking place.

In other words: Maybe I should just handle i this way?

{This is a very interesting, albeit seriously hypocritical, claim from a country that has repeatedly used and continues to use the alibis of spreading Democratic values such as Freedom and Human Rights of all to justify interfering in other countries (e.g., through the activities of the National Endowment for Democracy and USAID ), and to actively and passively obscure the imposition of U.S. interests first and foremost.}

{“The United States Supreme Court has consistently affirmed the constitutional right to freedom of speech and the rights of peaceful assembly and association, including by avowed Nazis, whose hatred and xenophobia are vile and widely scorned by the American people. We nevertheless firmly defend the constitutional rights of those who exercise their fundamental freedoms to combat intolerance and express strong opposition to the odious Nazi creed and others that espouse similar hatreds.”}

In other words. What's next? Like with allowing claims of impunity for law enforcement who break laws, we're now going to accept impunity claims for certain types of groups who display inhumane ideology and commit violent acts within hate crime definitions too? O! Wait! We already do.

{Second, the U.S. Mission to the UN’s rationale against the resolution is disingenuous. It presents a false equivalency that wrongly places on equal footing—morally, legally and practically—the freedom of Nazis, fascists and white supremacists and the freedom of those who oppose them. Despite numerous evidence of white supremacist, fascist and Nazi crimes in history, including colonization, genocidal practices, violent repressions, inhumane biological experimentations, mass imprisonments, common use of torture, disappearances and summary executions, ethnic, religious discriminatory policies and much more, the United States effectively reduces the history of white supremacy’s crime to a set of ideas, admittedly very bad ideas, by some whose rights are nevertheless no more, no less important than those of people opposing such ideas. Thus, the United States remains steadfast in protecting the rights of those who think that all Jews, Blacks, Muslims or any other target of fascist ideas should be exterminated. Put another way, expressing and promoting racist ideas, advertising the inferiority, the laziness, the mental sickness of Black people, the viciousness and deviousness of Asians, the spiritual corruption of women, the contagious transmission of ills by immigrants, etc. become commensurate, equally valid and equally defensible as ideas that are their categorical, political and moral opposite, no matter how historically and scientifically rooted this opposition may be.}

{We must not consider ideas, dangerous or otherwise, as divorced from action. Does the former not give rise to the latter in most cases? According to the argument of the U.S. Mission, the problem with Adolf Hitler did not lie so much in his ideas, nor in his right to write Mein Kampf, but seemingly in the implementation of his ideas. However, it is difficult to comprehend how one might implement ideas without conceiving of these ideas in the first place.}

Here in lies the entire scope of the hypocrisy of these people. Both in their ideology of their views being American and support for troops. While I have my own theory of conspiracy on the founding of America, I'm fairly certain WWI and WWII wasn't in support of their ideology. Or that a majority of those who fought in those wars supported it.

My theory in regards to this time frame would be more along the lines that what is acceptable in the lines of this ideology got out of hand in the late 1900's. And the world elite realizing they had to distinguish the radicalization of it, used it to advance the then growing industrial age and military complex. Of course, also, the growing Marxist movements that were uprising and exposing the world capitalist failures.

Most people still don't know how world banks and corporations help to fund and support Germany's rebuild of their military against the treaty ofter WWI. Or they consider it a conspiracy theory of the false propaganda narrative. Hitler and Russia were simply pulled into a major con job to distinguish their acceptance of an inhumane ideology gone radicalized that correlates with their world view.

{The refusal of the United States to uphold this resolution, as 130 other countries did, speaks to the American commitment against officially impeding any rise and growth of white supremacist, Nazi, neo-Nazi, fascist, neofascist, racist and xenophobic ideologies. By pretending to hold a lofty, magnanimous position, i.e., one above and beyond the aforementioned isms and ideologies, the United States can now refuse to combat these ideologies in the name of freedom of thought and expression, with all ideas being equal. This is a not-so-subtle hypocrisy.}

Quite frankly I view this as the allowance within our nation as being the next to radicalize the ideology which happened in Germany. We basically have no representation genuinely speaking out against it. Its presence in Ukraine and those who supported it went media blackout, went as a norm during the entire Trump campaign of 2016 rallies, and protest through that period, how they used web game site chats to organize, infiltration of law enforcement and the military, was highly diminished in the Jan 6 hearing proceedings, erased in the Rittenhouse case. I could go on and on with voting and abortion and other issues going on across the country. O! lets not forget about all the mass shootings during that duration either. But the underlining issue to me is that it seems obvious that both establishment parties, in collaboration with MSCM reluctance to cover, its slowly being a manufactured acceptance in our society.

All that needs to be fulfilled now is the full adaptation into the judicial system. I now wonder if we aren't witnessing a coming of a civil war between this ideology and social dissent. Now more sooner than later than I thought. All it's going to take is a major incident in large proportion they act on. I don't put it past the type of people who are organizing the Trump movement to have already been preparing for such shit.

{The United States does not vote for combating the glorification of Nazism, of all forms of discrimination because fundamentally and to this day, these ideologies represent in various forms the very foundation of capitalist, imperialist America. The United States confirms that it is white supremacist. From thought to act, with the exception of its alliance with the Soviet Union during World War II, from Europe to South America through Africa and South East Asia, the United States has repeatedly, explicitly and for all to know, associated itself, financed and supported all fascist regimes of various brands. And the United States’ vote against this resolution certainly caters to its fascist allies or nations that did collaborate with Nazis and fascists, protecting them from both present dangers as well as the threat of historical memory.}

{In this country, let us spell it clearly, embracing Nazism, neo-Nazism, all practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism, of racial discrimination and of xenophobia are deemed by the United States as a Right. The white supremacy of the 19th and early 20th Century need no longer be hidden, it is now protected as a Right. From the United States’ institutional perspective, to embrace the ideology that gave rise to the genocides of colonialism, to the Holocaust and more, is today, perversion of perversions, a Human Right.

We must state the obvious: Nazism and all forms of supremacist incarnations directly oppose, and are contradictory to human rights. The contradiction in the U.S. Mission’s response is this: One cannot both fight against the “murderous tyranny of Nazism” and then turn around and espouse tolerance for it. These two “ideas” are mutually exclusive. One cannot be a fascist and an anti-fascist. One cannot be racist and anti-racist simultaneously. Supporting or choosing one side (e.g., violent extremism) precludes membership in its opposite. In the end, the United States, once more, true to its roots and true to its ideology, stands as the protector of all neo-Nazis, neo-fascists, white supremacists, racists and xenophobes.}

The rest goes on to describe our horrific history and correlations.