@RodneyHunter ...I am getting notification that you have replied to my comment but your reply isn't showing (on my computer). Could you repeat it as a new comment and tag me please?

It's hard to discuss something that simply isn't there. It's easier to describe radio frequencies that we don't see. At least they account for something.

Were you stoned when you wrote this?
This sounds exactly like my son, after he has smoked pot.

You are testing the definition of "destroy" here. What is destruction other than "mere" change? Leaving one iota of wiggle room for the possibility that any kind of cognitive integrity might survive the death of the body is the same as allowing that the views of the most zealous bible-thumping jesus-freak might be factually accurate. They "might" be, indeed, but we have zero evidence to support such a notion, and mountains of evidence to explain why we might be tempted to entertain the idea. Sure, there is life after biological death. But it doesn't belong to the dead.

God is not omnipotent or omnipresent. As well as he isn't omniscient.

I agree to all of this.

To take your silly question seriously, you are going to have to take the ideal of supernatural beings, beings that have the control of space time seriously.
When I first joined this site, I asked this question.

"When filling out the questionnaire while signing up, it asked me what percentage do you believe in a God. I found this question to be disengenious for the question should be what is God? Is God a guy wearing a lab coat studying our artificial universe? Is God a tulpa, created by the worshipers in a church? is God a Devine field? I never once believed that God is some all powerful dude has a master plan, white and has a long beard."
And the reason why I asked these questions is that they're all possible.
so Maybe you should be asking the question, was this biblical God a fake, a supernatural being playing around with primative man for his own ego sake. Because that's the only way to logically think that your query has something base on reality

It seems to me that you’re referencing Spinoza’s definition of god as omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent. In any practical, rational sense no such thing could exist n our reality and make sense. Hence, if god does exist, then god would have to exist outside of our reality. Given the options, god is unapproachable, unprovable and irrelevant.

Life is CAF, and there's not a lot we can do about that... except accept it.

You need to stop wasting your time in even thinking about it; gods do not exist they are a construct of the human mind to deal with our scientific ignorance.