Agnostic.com

6 5

I am pro second amendment, and pro first amendment. You need the second to assure the that you have the first. thanks for reading my thoughts.

Leutrelle 7 July 6
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

What a silly statement.

2

Here's my stand on the second amendment: So long as you demonstrate no history of violent behavior or psychological instability, you should be allowed to own as many fire arms as you wish. You should lose that right immediately once you have commit any sort of violent crime or are diagnosed by a medical professional to be demonstrating unstable and dillusional behavior.

Sheep talk! When a woman can claim fear and courts say prove her wrong due process is lost! And that shut happens often enough.

1

Well said Leutrelle, I agree. I see some clueless chumps made some absurd remarks, the one guy must have been born after 1986. To think, folks like that are against the President and call him ignorant, some irony writ large there...

1

I agree on both. I also think the sale of automatic weapons to the private citizen should end.

The sale of automatic weapons to private citizens is already illegal.

@Trajan61 , I realize this. I thought I typed semi-. I stand corrected.

@Josephknecht That's OK, everybody else knew what you meant. 👍

0

That almost felt like being at a Quaker meeting

@maturin1919 and stand to speak their mind when the feel moved in their meeting otherwise stay silent

3

The men who wrote those gave a lot of thought into what they did. Agree these are important things.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:124454
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.