Is it better to have loved and lost, than to have never loved at all? I say love and loss, because we will never know unless we try... The experience gained will help make better choices later on... what do you think and why?
1
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
7 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.After about the 8th time the losses begin to add up.
clarkatticus
Level 7
Aug 24, 2018
1
Absolutely, yes. And the reason I feel that way is because I never used to. I cut myself off from relationships for a long time because of personal issues I was dealing with. Now I'm willing to take the chance, even if I may get hurt. Yes, you never know until you try.
bleurowz
Level 8
Aug 24, 2018
0
I'd rather not have loved, for all the happy moments while in love the heartache and pain from being hurt surmounts it all.
jamrock876
Level 6
Aug 24, 2018
0
It depends. If you loved someone and it was reciprical and you were compatible but something went wrong, then it's better to have loved and lost.
But if you are in a pattern of loving emotionally abusive people and gaslighters, then it's better to leave romance alone until you get a handle on your need to punish yourself.
birdingnut
Level 8
Aug 24, 2018
1
@MissMac Me, too!
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.