Agnostic.com

4 1

The world is divided into men who have wit and no religion and men who have religion and no wit.

Avicenna 5 Sep 6
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

It is interesting how men of wit are remembered more than those of great religiosity.

0

Wit, it seems to me, is a quality that is both envied and held in contempt. Wit can involve wordplay, irony, satire, sarcasm and even cynicism. Personally, I find the cynic rather dull and brooding. When I think of wit, names like Shakespeare, Voltaire, Twain and Wilde come to mind, men whose religiosity was almost certainly below average. But I am also reminded of Tennyson's line, "Too much wit makes the world rotten."

I like Benjamin Franklin’s take on wit...”At twenty years of age, the will reigns; at thirty the wit; and at forty, the judgement.” However I would dispute the ages and raise them all by at least 10 years!

@Marionville Benjamin Franklin was a wit himself. Have you ever read his letter, "Advice to a Young Man on the Choice of a Mistress?"

@pnfullifidian No but I will look for it.

0

Don't forget the men (and women) who have no wit and no religion and the men (and women) who have wit and religion though I'll grant you that those two groups I mentioned might not be as large as yours.

Dietl Level 7 Sep 6, 2018

Inspire debate? But that's exactly what my post is about, debating the flaws of your quote 🙂

0

And women!

@Avicenna Yes, I agree but it should more correctly be human not man. I was just being a little pedantic! ?

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:172595
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.