Creationism isn't just wrong scientifically and historically, it's also wrong ethically and morally. Does simultaneously sadist and most laughable irony of this whole stupid conversation is that these zealots claim they're opposed to Evolution as an issue of morality. yet while we can cite dozens of examples where politically influential creationist clearly know they're lying about science, there is no such instance where in evolutionary scientist can be shown to be dishonest and their criticisms of creationism. There is no need to be. Despite all the attempted deception, the baseless assertions and political division produced by the creationism movement, the truth is there has never been a single verifiably accurate argument of evidence indicative of Miraculous Creation over biological Evolution or any other Avenue of actual science. Not one period. neither has there ever been any credible proponent of creation science, because with dr. Periannan senapathy as the one crackpot exception, everyone who has ever published anti-evolutionary rhetoric to any medium did so only according to a prior religious agenda rather than any amount of scientific comprehension. Dave all revealed inexcusable ignorance in the fields where they claim expertise, and their arguments or all dependent on erroneous assumptions, prejudicial bias, logical fallacies, ridiculous parody, Misdefined terms, Misquoted authorities, distorted data, fraudulent figures or out-and-out lies. Thus there are only two types of arguments for creationism, those that are untestable, implausible, and indistinguishable from the illusions of delusion, which can neither be indicated nor Vindicated, verified or disproved, and those that have already been disproved!