Agnostic.com

5 3

How many times have you felt this way in life?

[psychologytoday.com]

6 Certain Signs of Being in Love
Science-based ways to know if you're in love.
Posted Jun 23, 2017
Is this love or is it something else?

People talk about being "in" or "out" of love, but this clear, categorical distinction isn't always reflective of reality. The puzzle of whether you're actually in love is further complicated, because different people define love differently. Some think of it as peaceful, quiet companionship; others view it as an intense physiological experience marked by longing and passion. Still others (e.g., Sternberg, 1986) recognize that some love — consummate love — has intimacy and passion, as well as commitment.

Relationships characterized by consummate love, the kind of mutual love that will last, often share certain features. Turning to the research, here are six central signs of being in love:

  1. You're authentic with this person. Showing the real you is part of the experience of finding the kind of love that can last. Couples that prioritize honest conversation and true self-disclosure, rather than habits of deception, tend to be more satisfied (Lopez & Rice, 2006) and to have the kind of open exchanges that allow for deeper connection.

  2. Your eyes really are only for each other. People in love tend to focus in on each other. Indeed, one strong predictor of relationships ending is how attentive people are to other potential dating partners. Research shows that looking at and paying attention to desirable alternative partners predicts less commitment, investment, and satisfaction (Miller, 1997), all factors that tend to be found in loving, lasting relationships (Rusbult, 1980).

  3. Your physical relationship leaves you with an afterglow. Often, for people in love, sex is more than just sex. New research suggests that it's the positive affect and affection that many couples experience through sexual activity — not sex itself — that drive positive outcomes for individuals and their relationships (Debrot et al., 2017).

  4. You're motivated to make your partner's life easier. Passion is important, but so too is concern for your partner, and his or her concern for you. People's relationships benefit when each partner gives and receives the kind of generous caring designed to promote each other's well-being, termed compassionate love (Fehr, Harasymchuk, & Sprecher, 2014). While this alone won't define being "in love," it is a structural component that distinguishes short-term lust from the kind of long-term love you might be looking for.

  5. You take risks with your partner. Sometimes it's easier to gloss over your past or tell a difficult story without the real emotion, but intimate risk taking appears to be a positive factor in satisfying relationships (Lopez & Rice, 2006). Love provides the safety and trust that enables people to engage in uninhibited self-disclosure.

  6. You intrinsically enjoy your partner's company. You're attracted to your partner, but how much do you like him or her? Liking is distinct from passion, but a component of the kind of "in love" that tends to translate into long-term relationship happiness (Ault & Lee, 2016). Liking your partner signals a high degree of reward in a relationship, and the kind of interpersonal pleasure helpful in sustaining a relationship.

While research psychologists search for more elements of the ever-elusive equation that defines love and being in love, findings to date suggest that both emotional and cognitive factors play a part. In other words, affective reactions matter, but so too do decisions, such as commitment decisions, in determining if you've found lasting love.

References

Ault, L. K., & Lee, A. (2016). Affective and interpersonal correlates of relationship satisfaction. Philosophy, 6, 115-130.

Debrot, A., Meuwly, N., Muise, A., Impett, E. A., & Schoebi, D. (2017). More than just sex: Affection mediates the association between sexual activity and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Advanced online publication.

Fehr, B., Harasymchuk, C., & Sprecher, S. (2014). Compassionate love in romantic relationships: A review and some new findings. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 575-600.

alanalorie 7 Oct 29
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1
1

I am not sure what love is anymore.

Sick and tired of dating life or marriage?

@alanalorie Not at all. I am not afraid of either. It seems to me the definition of romantic love might be fairly subjective. I have struggled with what it means to me. I have been in love, or what l believed was love, a few times in my life just to look up too often wondering what the Hell went wrong. I would like to be in a relationship. I am just not sure at my age, if it is in the cards for me. ☺

1

4 or 5 I guess

1

True enough but they are just elaborating what cathexis is. Cathexis inehrently cannot last, because of hedonic tone. At some point you have to take back your projections and do the hard work of relationship-building and maintenance.

And then the problems begin.

For example you can be authentic and the other person can accept you as you are, until they can't. Until your bullshit starts to annoy them. It's then, possibly months or years after you have pair-bonded, that you find out whether or not they are really committed to do whatever it takes to go the distance, if they have the epistemological humility to understand they are less than perfect also, if they are truly loyal and devoted to you and to the relationship or not. Of course finding out too late that they aren't up for it, doesn't lessen the emotional pain of dealing with it -- almost no matter HOW you deal with it.

Too many of us expect the other person to become us or embrace us uncritically forever, and this simply isn't possible.

Thanks for adding to the conversation. I think cathexis has to wear down or people would not get anything done. I have has a scholar who disagrees with me. Then I think it turns into companionate love.

(updated) [psychology.iresearchnet.com]

Do you think it is impossible to have this type of love if there is work on love? Unconditional love is rare but possible for some people. I think it is unwise to have unconditional love for a mate. Having unconditional love for the wrong mate that mistreats you has been an experience that I have had.

@alanalorie "Companionate" love is a term I haven't heard before but yes that is possible, if people let go of their attachment to and insistence on eternal romance, best destiny, and similar concepts. The only thing that makes my wife special is that I decide that she's special. Sure she has remarkable and admirable qualities but so do other people. So did my previous wife (now deceased) but a somewhat different mix of attributes. I loved her too. But fundamentally and in the long run because I decided to, not because she was The One.

I'm not sure many partners are content with companionability; they often in my experience and observation want some nebulous sense of connection they can't really define or describe; they judge the quality of their partner's commitment by how they feel rather than by how they are treated. That's not a good place to be because what if they have negative feelings that originate in their own personal issues rather than in some defect in the relationship? Beyond a certain point if your partner is committed to you and treats you well and prefers your company then there's not a whole lot more to it. But I've known people to exit perfectly "companionable" relationships because they expect their relationship to address feelings of alienation or insecurity or boredom or whatever -- or even just because it's not "exciting" enough. And I've seen them put quite a bit of stress on relationships they don't leave, with the same complaints.

1

I don't rightly know. Hold on. Let me ask my attachment schema. 😉

Lol! I think I am funny, but not everyone agrees.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:211017
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.