How is it that over a billion people have come to call Islam a religion of peace? And what are we to do about it? I have come to the conclusion that assigning nasty labels to them is never going to improve the situation. People do not respond to being attacked. I think the key is to understand that we are all born into a continuum of enlightenment. I am the product of where and when I was born and raised. Shaming Muslims for simply being Muslim does absolutely no good at all. Perhaps the solution is to celebrate the fact that they are actively and intentionally moving themselves towards peace and enlightenment! Perhaps we should point the critical eye towards ourself and ask why we are so quick to shame and condemn instead of extending the hand of compassion and love.
I totally disagree. We are not quick to shame them in fact it has taken us far too long to see them for what they are and lessons must be learnt. I agree though that simply tagging them doesn't help there must be far more serious steps taken the future is at stake
Do nothing, except extend respect and love to all people. They are us and we are them.
Perfect answer William xx
I don't think it's unfair to observe that Islam tends to have a larger percentage of overtly violent adherents than Christianity, even allowing for familiarity and confirmation bias. However the reason for that has less to do with Islam's teachings than it does with the greater percentage of Muslims living in poverty and ignorance -- although how much of that is bad luck and how much is fundamentalist Islam dogfooding its own regressive beliefs to its adherents is hard to tease out. Particularly when much of that poverty and want is in Islamic theocracies where you can't tell the religion apart from the government as they are mostly one and the same. Come to think of it -- sort of how American Christian Fundamentalists fantasize about ever since RJ Rushdoony in the early 1960s. And that may yet come to pass. Handmaid's Tale, anyone?
With a few details of history being different, the situation could well have been (and may yet be) reversed. The Bible is not without violent, xenophobic, misogynistic stuff that could be emphasized over the pleasant, noble-seeming ideas. And in fact at particular times in history, exactly that has been done.
The Islamic equivalent of the Enlightenment was choked in its crib by hardline fundamentalists; it's hard to know if that's an accident of history or something more likely to happen because of Islamic ideology.
@David_Cooper The Bible also curses anyone who changes "so much as one jot or tittle" in the text (those being essentially what we'd call dotting i's and crossing t's), as well as stridently condemning anyone who teaches "heresy". I'm curious how Mohammed managed to top that.
It seems to me that your typical Muslim citizen here in the US (demographically different from how many of them are in Europe, they are actually better educated, wealthier and more law abiding than the average US citizen) just do what liberal Christians do, they ignore inconvenient commands and cherry pick what they're going to observe. But for that to happen in Christendom, the hegemony of more dogmatic sentiments had to be broken. And if Christian fundies continue to gain ground in the US, they will intimidate or even abuse the liberals into line or at least into silence, and then will accordingly run amok. I still see nothing inherent in Islam that dictates there can be no such thing as a moderate or liberal Muslim, anymore than I see anything inherent in Christianity that there will always be moderate or liberal Christians. Look no further than Uganda and Kenya for examples of what Christianity can devolve into in modern times.
Regardless, we must oppose extremists of whatever stripe, without painting moderates of each stripe with the same brush. Yeah there's a sense in which we unbelievers oppose Christianity or religion generally here in the US and not just Christian fundamentalism, because any ideology divorced from evidential supports will tend to become fundamentalist. However ... neither do I see all believers as fundies and I think that just leads to more fascistic thinking, the very thing we fault them for. We cannot write off whole groups of people as "less than".
@David_Cooper I'd feel more like you about it if I lived in your part of the world. As I said, here in the US, we have mostly educated middle and upper class Muslims. Two Muslim women just won seats in Congress tonight. It's hard to radicalize successful, upwardly-mobile people, even in 'Murica.
Also in contrast to your situation, fundamentalist Christians are not a dying breed here, so they are a far greater threat than fundamentalist Muslims. The speed with which things are turning to shit here is breathtaking and, frankly, terrifying. In just two years under Trump we have concentration camps on the borders, talk of shooting unarmed refugees, and lately claims that Trump's opponents are fomenting violent rebellion; we've lost our leadership and credibility in the world, and embolden tyrants.
I actually think fundies are a dying breed in the long run, but am now fairly certain we're heading for a painful and possibly lengthy dystopian sideshow where they will try to pull us all down with them. Even though in the end such ideologies are unsustainable, they are and will remain very dangerous for some time to come.