Agnostic.com

2 1

Holy fucking shit! I know this guy! Another good move from the Catholics.

[ketv.com]

TheGreatShadow 9 Nov 5
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

That link is blocked from viewing in the UK

I have the same problem with some sites from the UK. Here's a screenshot that sums it up.

@TheGreatShadow Thanks

1

This seems at least superficially like a step in the right direction, and it may even be intended as such. But all I really see here is yet another priest accused and judged guilty of significant sexual impropriety and then just returned to service. That is not zero tolerance and the message it sends is that the church will still paper over your sexual "sins", it will just make more of a show of it and it might require you to actually pretend to undergo some treatment.

I agree with you that this seems like a step in the right direction. But, what really happened? I doubt he'll get any criminal charges.

@TheGreatShadow Yes and there's also the problem that it's like using a watering can on a five-alarm fire. The church is demonstrably guilty of molesting literally tens of thousands of children in multiple jurisdictions due to obvious systemic problems. This is not an appropriate or proportional response to the actual problem, and the emphasis remains on providing understanding and comfort and help to the perpetrator. I don't see a single word about what was done for the victims or their families.

The response is also local, it's not top-down from Vatican-level initiatives.

It does not get at the root problem, the celibacy requirement for priests and the resultant sexual repression and its knock-on effects. It doesn't add real, comprehensive transparency either. It adds some, in a controlled fashion, said control being in the hands of the archbishop. I could go on and on. It's ultimately just really clever PR.

@mordant Another valid point I wanted to bring up. IT's vague about what he actually did, but as long as I've known he's been touchy-feely. I wish I could show you, but a friend of mine reported him about 15 years ago. He never went to jail, and I never got a reply as to what happened.

@TheGreatShadow Some people are affectionate by nature, and sometimes it's innocent. Others convince themselves it's innocent but it's not. Like that AME bishop who hugged -- who was it, Ariana Grande? -- on-camera while she tried to fend him off in every conceivable form of body language available to her without making an overt scene, and then he issued a disrespectful non-apology in the face of everyone's outrage ("sorry if you were offended by my innocent affection" ).

Even those I think are just cluelessly naive should know better. Joe Biden is a prime example. An affectionate shoulder-rub on your niece at the Thanksgiving table is not something you should do in front of TV cameras in public with strangers. And your niece probably doesn't even like it.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:216739
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.