Cyclical theory of history:
After reading through many history books, there is a distinctive trend for many given empires or nations to only enjoy a 'golden age' of relative growth and prosperity for approximately 200 years then a decline either sudden and dramatic or pushed over the brink of a lengthly recession. Ancient examples include the greek golden age, the middle kingdom of egypt, and the dynasties of China. Medieval nations such as Burgundy, Florentine and Flanders city states, and Spain also followed the trend. More modern examples include USA that had a devestating civil war 200 years after the 13 colonies were permanently established.
anyone else like to discuss this?
The reasons for declines are obvious, but different depending on the civilisation affected. Dynastic theory of people inheriting luxury and becoming corrupt is taken very seriously by Asian and Arab historians. In Russia, references to leaders being incompetent and disinterested in rulership abound in the times of troubles, possibly from ingesting poisonous arsenic or mercury causing a degree of mental retardation. USA appears to show evidence of brain drain economies and possible genetic damage in the urbanised areas and the south eastern corner at least judging from public school results. A series of europeans have lost interest in their highly profitable trading empires and simply lost their cutting edge of ingenuity when it comes to industry.
According to the bureau of statistics immigration records in Australia, people immigrating for business have done very well, but not as well as those banished from their home countries for social reasons. Economic motivations for immigration usually have resulted in nothing more than manual labour and subsistance farming