Doesn't it also state that life begins at birth?

Nobody really expects them to be logical., do they?

First the 'pro-life' title is a misnomer. It is not about LIFE, writ large, in that it concerns all life. It should be Pro-human life.
These people follow the rule to go forth and multiply never mind the fact that 7.5+ Billion of us are seriously depleting the Earth's resources. They say they care for human life but the fact is they only care before it is born. Afterward one is on their own and if they are smart they better get lots of guns. They say that life begins at conception but then that would make their god the biggest abortionist of all. Also, many studies have shown abortion is far, far safer than giving birth. Giving birth is the single largest killer of women worldwide.

The anti-choice argument is born only of misogyny and the need to control and punish others. It has absolutely nothing to do with religion.

The bible is used to be interpreted to meet anyone's personal need. You can authorize killing or anything else you wish if you find the right passage.It isn't the great book it is made out to be.It is a book for non readers which was when it was published.

It's shocking. You give them life, feed and educate them, and when you decide you hate the little bastards and want to kill them, the state behaves like it owns them.

I know so many hardcore Christians who had abortions themselves and are against it. One is a preacher. Fuckers.

Personally, until God stops aborting fetuses, then the argument is moot.

As Azimov wrote, "It is better to abort before birth."

The notion that life begins at conception was pointed out in a famous essay to be "the doctrine that's younger than a MacDonald's Happy Meal".

[patheos.com]

Even fundamentalists used to debate whether fetuses were persons, and to what extent.