Agnostic.com

2 1

BEWARE - ANOTHER FACEBOOK BETRAYAL

Report: Facebook shared messages, friend lists without users’ consent

Associated Press
Facebook gave some companies more extensive access to users’ personal data than it has previously revealed, letting them read private messages or see the names of friends without consent, according to a New York Times report.
The newspaper on Wednesday detailed special arrangements between Facebook and companies such as Microsoft, Netflix and Spotify, in revelations on how the social network shares user data. Here are highlights.

The deals: Facebook shared data with more than 150 companiesthrough apps on its platform even if users disabled sharing. Apps from many of these “integration partners” never even showed up in user application settings, with the company considering them an extension of its own network. The deals dated back as far as 2010 and were all active in 2017, with some still in effect this year.

Private messages: Spotify, Netflix and the Royal Bank of Canada were able to read, write and delete Facebook users’ private messages, and to see everyone on a message thread. Spotify could look at messages of more than 70 million users a month and still lets users share music through Facebook Messenger while Netflix and the Canadian bank have turned off features that incorporated message access.

Friends: Facebook let Microsoft’s Bing search engine see the names of “virtually all Facebook users’ friends without consent,” the paper said. Microsoft officials said Bing was using the data to build Facebook user profiles on Microsoft servers but the company has since deleted the data. Yahoo had the ability to show Facebook users’ news feeds, including posts by their friends, on its home page. The search company eliminated the feature in 2012.

Facebook’s response: Facebook responded to the report in a blog post, which said the partnerships did allow features like “messaging integrations” but nearly all have been shut down over the past few months, except for deals with Apple and Amazon. None of the deals gave outside companies access to data without user consent, it said.

kensmile4u 8 Dec 20
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Asshats

0

I heard this, this morning. I also heard the comment that this is another form of a predatory monopoly and that we need a resurgence of anti-trust laws. To me, too often we let the rich and powerful get their way because it strengthens the "economy." Right now there is a big fight in the Queens in NY about the tax break given to Amazon to employee 25,000 workers and what negative impacts this company will have on the area. Lets see $3 billion tax break divided by 25,000 employees gives $120,000 per employee. Why doesn't the state just take that tax break and use it too help the local economy directly?

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:248005
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.