Agnostic.com

7 1

Ruth Bader Ginburg has 2 cancerous tumors remove from her lungs. Kinda gets my hopes up as I’d like for Trump to have an opportunity to replace her. Wouldn’t that drive the liberals absolutely bonkers!

Trajan61 8 Dec 21
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

7 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

My view is that the more Cadet Bone Spurs appoints the more targets we have when the revolution comes! the rethuglicans want the world run by corporations and the 1%! When the people can't take it any more then it blows up and a lot of good goes out with the bad. Sad no matter how you look at it.

BillF Level 7 Dec 22, 2018
1

Yeah I’ve lost two family members to cancer so I wouldn’t hope that shit for trump but since you wanna go there the last time I checked his two appointments to the Supreme Court haven’t been hitting home runs for the conservatives either.

You know that whole pesky constitional law thing that both are so stubborn about. So if he wants to appoint another then sure but I’ve got a funny feeling that come January he’ll be lucky to get a ham sandwich from the hill let alone get a Supreme Court Justice appointed.

But hey it’s your dream so enjoy it before you wake up.

3

I often wonder when I see posts like this. What is your vision for America? How do you think it should be? Youre an old man. Do you even care anymore? Are you just excited to watch it burn?

Della Level 6 Dec 22, 2018

That's about the size of it. Old angry right wing guy syndrome clinging on to the past... God I'm sick of it. We need more angry old left wing guys clinging to the notion of a better fairer future.... like Bernie... and me!

0

Well, I don't wish cancer to anyone...now, she is "getting old".

You may not like my words but we need a SC that is balanced. No, I am not changing my conservative position

I’d like to get another judge like Kavanaugh or Gorsuch.

@Trajan61 Well, I want a balanced SCI believe is better for the nation.

0

Sometimes it looks like he does stupid shit just to piss people off. Other times he just does stupid shit.

Wait... ''does stupid shit''?? Are you suggesting he had something to do with her tumors or something? Or are you going off topic just to say something belligerent about your President? ?

Replacing RBG with another chowderhead like Kavanaugh would be more Trumpian stupid shit. Seems pretty obvious to me.

@jerry99 Kavanaugh will be a lot better judge than Ginsburg ever was.

@jerry99 Aah yes,, couldn't wait to stoop to a low brow ad hominem... still waiting to see what Trump had to do with her cancer... Never mind jerry,,, not worth my time..?

@jerry99 Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a piece of crap judge that doesn’t even believe the 2nd amendment gives us private citizens the right to bear arms so what are you talking about?

2

Well, why not. A corrupt, fraudulent, unrepresentative, gerrymandered Senate, representing a fraction of the population, supporting a predominantly white oligarchy, rigging your Supreme Court to enforce a Right Wing reactionary agenda of a minority over a progressive majority. Let's hear it for autocracy, oligarchy, regressive political agendas, voter suppressed, gerrymandered sham democracies, and white suprematist rule generally. Happy Days. Another chapter in the decline of the American Empire. Throw in lead in the pipes and it'll be Rome all over again.

How do you gerrymander the Senate?
Those are statewide elections.
Have they been redrawing the borders of the states, and I'm not aware of it?

Haaahahahaha... well how about you tell us how you REEEEAAAAALLY feel about your beloved POTUS.. If he puts people in there that put the Constitution first,, good for him.. ??

@BD66 I was referring to the absurdity of a state like California with a huge population having the same number of senators as little states. Absurdly unrepresentative. As Stephen Colbert has said often, why the hell are there two Dakotas? It's a gerrymandering that favours small conservative lower populations over larger ones. As your political analysts have said, the Senate has this huge amount of power drawn from small vote base.

@David1955 That's what the founding fathers intended when there were 4 huge states: Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, and MA. It's the same story today. If national elections and congressional representation were purely based on the popular vote, politicians would visit, CA, TX, FL, NY, PA, OH, and IL and ignore all the other states.

2

What? You happy with the orange marmalade selling off National Parks, or how about him revoking laws about dumping of toxic waste into waterways, or how about him revoking laws about banks lending money to people who cannot the loans (mortgage). You happy with that?

I’m very happy with Trump so what are you rambling about?

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:249310
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.