There was once a rich man and a poor man. The state decides to help the poor man, so to get funds it raises a tax. The rich man's tax adviser tells him where to move his money, when and how to move his money, so he pays very little of the tax, the poor man has no tax adviser and so pays a lot of it. The state then employs a civil servant to spend to money on the poor man, but first of course the civil servant takes a share to cover the expenses, (with a bit extra of course), the civil servant then feels better off, and so the civil servant buys an even bigger house, from the rich man's company, who also got richer.
And so everyone is happy, the state has done something about poverty, the civil servant is better off and the rich man is even richer. Did I forget somebody ?
@Veteran229 Then the rich man said. "I am glad you bought your house off your dad, but I hope you are not involved in any coruption?" And the son said. "No it is just left over expenses money." "Oh that's Ok cos' that's legal like tax avoidance."
@Veteran229 The left wing statest would say that they can spend the money more effectively, the right wing statest would say that he will spend it on sugar and tobbaco not boots, so he is better of without it. Of course they could provide the poor man with a good education, so that he would know why tobaco and sugar are bad for him, but see, that would cost money, and then they would not have any to spend on sugar and tobbaco.