When in defence of religion, people say ‘Well the church does a lot of good’ but is it not like a lawyer saying ‘Yes, my client robbed a few banks and killed a few people but he bought his parents some very nice presents and was very generous to his friends’...
Xians don't do anything that secularists don't do and non-believers do it without trying to spread all that Jebus shit around.
XIAN
"Thank you for helping me find my lost dog."
"You're welcome. That good Lord above guided us in the right direction. Have you heard the Word of the Lord?"
SECULAR
"Thank you for helping me find my lost dog."
"You're welcome."
Which church? Some of ‘em do good things IMO.
Yes. Religion does a lot of good merely because it's ubiquitous and a primary platform for belonging and community. Some people and some communities do a lot of good, sometimes more good than harm. Others do not.
It's also the same thing as a tobacco company pointing to its charitable giving or an exploitive diamond mine pointing to the joy of all the young ladies gifted with their wares.
You had to go and mention tobacco.
Now I want a cigarette...
The answer is simply.
Even if the churches did only good, awesome, moral etc things.
This does not prove god is real.
You can have a club of people doing good things that does not claim some unveriafiable truth...
Religion is based on a false premise -- the existence of supernatural beings and realms, supported by the failed epistemology of religious faith -- and so cannot help but be harmful to the brains of billions of people. Any good done in the midst of that is just window dressing.
It's one of the worst defences of religion I hear. Churches "do a lot of good." I retort sharply: "Well then, do genuine good, spare us the Bronze Age mumbo jumbo, and clean up your act." It's pointless of course. The "good" is a ruse, a cover. Reminds me of gangsters like Al Capone, who used to give money to the poor and help people, letting everyone know it. All the time he was peddling bad booze, running brothels and protection rackets, not to mention murder to the point of mass slaughter. Won't do.
Doing 'good' as an act in and of itself easily and often becomes identified with the belief(s) of the person, group or organization that did something that is deemed good. Perhaps I am missing something but I am of the opinion that there is no need to attribute 'good' to any particular religion or political belief system. There is no need for any individual, religious or political organization to highlight their act as good, it somehow detracts from the act. Many good acts have been carried out by people who have remained anonymous.
Good acts may spring from questionable intentions that fuel the accumulation of Brownie points which may cause some people to believe that such and such person who carried out atrocities has some redeeming features
@ASTRALMAX yes, I should have added to my comment that I don't believe Churches do good, but that individuals in them may do good things because they are good people. I've noticed however that even then it's all about spreading their religious nonsense. Everything they do is to that end. I've also noticed that churches will do bandage good things, like charity, but fundamental reform and solutions, never.