What i dislike about being called an atheist is that it is a a negative thing. Denying the existence of a god or gods. In the UK there are probably more non believers than believers so we should start calling god botherers theists and drop the atheist label.
Situation dependent. I can easily prove that there isn't a beautiful, naked woman waiting for me in my bed right now.
Sigh.
It’s sometimes hard to prove that something exists, but in general proving negative assertions is no harder than proving positive ones.
Proving that something exists (positive assertion) is easy. You find enough evidence of the thing or the thing itself.
Proving that something doesn't exist (a negative assertion) is a little bit harder. And by that I mean impossible. No matter where you look it could be somewhere else or you are not capable to detect it for whatever reason.
(We are only speaking about empirical assertions. There is no even prime number greater than 2 for instance)
@Dietl The question of whether a thing exists or doesn’t exist might be undecidable, but in general there is no problem proving negative assertions.
Proving a Negative:
[departments.bloomu.edu]
@WilliamFleming This is not the same I meant, though. With "a negative assertion" I didn't mean any proposition with a "negative" in it but the claim regarding the existence of a thing. You can't prove that a certain thing does not exist. But you can prove that a thing does exist. We have to agree on how we use words, you know? The link you gave me is a bit imprecise with their definitions.
This exists . . . .