If ever there was fertile ground to fight this issue, Ohio is the place. My deluded, fellow Ohioans elected to maintain the Republican hammerlock over this state for another four years. These high and mighty hypocrites are going to continue to assault women's rights in the name of their "savior" until the voters start getting hip to the scam in this state. For what it's worth, I'm not holding my breath. But this used to be, at least recently, a purple state. I would settle for that to be the correction toward a blue wave in Ohio down the road.
Pool versus klu klux Klan Masonic lodge governmental corruption organization et al Wichita falls TX and Amarillo TX Federal courts allow that child can be trained to speak and act abused so that governmental officials has probable cause to wrongfully prosecute innocent people especially those that oppose there European invasion Masonic lodge secret religion racist devil worship.
I don't get it. Quote from this Reuters article:
"It required the department to ensure that funds it received through six non-abortion-related federal programs was not used to fund entities that performed non-therapeutic abortions."
So if PP doesn't do abortions, what's the problem? They ensure those moneys don't go to entities that perform non-therapeutic abortions and case closed.
Or is it the case that PP did NOT want to make said assurance such that they kept the option to use non-abortion related federal programs to fund abortion entities?
Not entirely clear on what PP's stance against the law is for, if they truly don't fund abortions, as I read it, they would not have run afoul of this law. Maybe someone can explain exactly what the constitutional challenge was or what they were suing for, or against, as I'm very confused about this case...