Agnostic.com

7 3

WE HAVE BEEN FOOLED FOR CENTURIES

Lousy, crappy texts sold as holy texts and word of God for centuries. Here are some examples....

Do you agree?

  • 10 votes
  • 0 votes
  • 0 votes
St-Sinner 9 Mar 15
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

7 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

The bible is a very profoundly mediocre book that also contains many contradictions. I would like to know how Yahweh and Jesus are one based on "his" sayings, also some of his are contradictory and horrendous, and that is much of what current believers think.

Well said

1

All trash .

2

Of course it is all bollocks. Can you imagine any man cutting of his wifes hand if she touches his penis, he would come back for more time and time again.

But they stopped using it but all other bollocks are still in use. I can't imagine that Mary was a virgin either when she conceived.

1

I must be a bit thick today but I don't get your point. What are you asking us ?. Do we agree with ones marked "in".As far as I am concerned it's all a load of bollocks.

I was asking if is all bollocks. I see that you agreed?

1

You should check out evilbible.com

3

Your post is firing on all cylinders. It's to bad some christains don't see it that way.

I think it is just a matter of time, not just for Christians but all crazy Muslims, Jews, Hindus etc.

3

In fairness, Mark 16:17-18 is widely accepted even by most fundamentalists as one of those so-called "pious frauds" added in later by some scribe. That's where snake handling comes from, too. The last few verses of Mark, which includes this patent nonsense, is found only in much later manuscripts, is not mentioned by early church fathers, etc. So it's a "gimme" except for true knuckle-draggers who choose to embrace it anyway.

The divorce prohibition is still "IN' in some circles, sometimes as an actual prohibition and sometimes, as it was for me, more of a taboo to consider as anything but a last resort and/or an ideal to hold up. It was strong enough that it kept me married to my first wife for 15 years, and that's at least 14.5 years longer than any self-respecting person should have. There is an associated rule laid down by Paul that a church elder must be, among other things, "the husband of one wife". This was a notion that captured my imagination as it was taught as an ideal to aim for and a terrible tragedy to miss the target.

Some of these like the tattoo prohibition exist without many believers even being aware there's some scriptural support for it. It's rather like how at one time it was considered indecent for a woman to have skirts shorter than ankle-length, under then-prevalent notions of modesty. Or how modern believers make up the doctrine of the "age of accountability" out of thin air with no scriptural backing whatsoever ... because it's terribly inconvenient to tell bereaved parents of young children, yes, your child is in hell if they didn't profess faith in Jesus.

Fundamentalists have an awful lot to keep track of. Some days I pinch myself, being free of those endless lists of obscure rules and unrealistic expectations.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:311147
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.