Agnostic.com

5 1

Interesting results from Europe. One in four went AI.

[rt.com]

Let's see how my agnostic brethren feel.

"Who would you rather make important government decisions?

  • 4 votes
  • 4 votes
  • 3 votes
  • 6 votes
powder 8 Mar 20
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

None of the above. I could do without anyone or anything that thinks it has paternal authority.

@powder Why does that need to be a government function?

0

Combination of supervised elected people and well regulated AI and a variety of experts who know about the things the decisions are being made about.

MsAl Level 8 Mar 20, 2019

@powder AI is a tool just like a car or a computer. it helps humans do things more effectively or safely. It needs to be created and programmed by humans. It needs to be tightly regulated and inspected because humans often have their own self interests in mind when running the government. Or they may have the best of intentions but still have bad ideas about the goals for society. Using AI has the potential to help accomplish goals more effectively but also to mess things up on a much greater scale.

@powder Self running garden, yes, one that orders it's own parts and repairs itself seems a bit silly. Someone builds the garden and gives it those abilities regardless, even if one of those abilities is to learn new things and repair itself.

Also that is a tool for growing things, not making government decisions. Humans could definately use knowledge obtained through AI to make more informed decisions. We can also use it to efficiently accomplish tasks like growing food and organize things like self driving cars, and medicine. Someone still creates it.

Some people try to imagine AI as an some sort of a Supernatural being. Sometimes I think athiests are drawn to that concept to replace religion. I think this way of thinking is a misguided magical way of looking at science.

0

The US is in theory a republic much like the old USSR was a republic (That should light some asses up). The idea of the founding fathers was to electric knowledgeable people who would elect those that ran every thing. Need knowledge.

"Knowledgeable" people meaning the wealthy.

0

You’re going to bias the results a bit if you say one in four Europeans voted for AI.

0

Republican principles, democracy is essential. Enlightened despotic government looks good in principle, but it creates mechanisms that will be abused by bad governments in the future.
That's why when you don't trust when Obama creates a law that can be abused, Trump can be the next pen owner...

@powder every system is nice in paper, even slaves sounds nice, as the owner should honour and respect the slaves and give conditions for their life, not abuse etc.
The good part of republic is that is limits power, it create check points where any abuse of power can be punished with loose of power or worse. That's is why in any political discussions you must go back to the principles of republic and democracy to understand why the system is like this, if it fits the ideals, and not only look at its immediate intentions.
Give power to the president seems good when you like the guy, not that food even he don't agree with you...

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:314226
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.