Agnostic.com

3 4

Jonathan Gottschall ('The storytelling animal) has pointed out that stories are our most powerful “virtual reality” technology, one we can use to simulate alternative future scenarios. This is why we love going to the theater or the cinema, reading novels, and immersing ourselves in computer games.
Religion, too, ranks among these “dual realities,” according to Frans de Waal. For this reason he compares those “neo-atheists” who only care about the facts of empirical reality to “people standing outside a movie theater telling us that Leonardo DiCaprio didn’t really go down with the Titanic." - How shocking! Most of us are perfectly comfortable with the duality.

Matias 8 Apr 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I'm guessing m de Waal just had an overweening desire to become an immortal, like most believers, and so prolly missed that Peter's warning about Paul was for him, "He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction." That being the same Paul who clearly stated "test everything, and keep what is true."

0

The real danger is not, at first anyway, that you will believe that DiCaprio went down with the Titanic but that the steady drip feed may start you into thinking his behavior while on board is normality. People worry sometimes that modern media may cause people to loose contact with reality, but the truth is, that the most powerful brain altering technology was born thousands of years ago, when people started telling tales round the campfire. And things like religion are the fruits of that.

1

The poet William Blake is being recognised more in recent times for his description of God, not as a product of imagination, but imagination itself. While we have a brain that allows for both analysis and imagination, analysis seems to be looked on as the more valid of the two aspects. It is vital that we can project alternative scenarios (and 'die' in the unsuccessful scenarios instead of in real life, as Jordan Peterson puts it), analyse them and choose the best option, but the human mind is also intiuitive and holistic and this side is sadly very underrated these days.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:323632
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.