Agnostic.com

5 2

I know how unpopular this is going to be (because I can't stand the guy, myself), but under Trump, unemployment hit its lowest level of any year since 1969.

But, when one considers that more than half of those jobs pay only $11 an hour, or less, I'm not sure this particular fact should really be celebrated, or even considered a "victory" by the Orange Ass Hat.

Source: [data.bls.gov]

Piratefish 7 May 9
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

This has nothing to do with Trump or Obama. It's just how the economy works. A recession creates unemployement and forces businesses to really fight for growth. It also forces some of the unemployed to start new businesses. It takes a long time to grow a business, After 5 or 6 years, only truly successful old and new businesses useful to the current markets will have survived. These are the businesses that will hire new employees, i.e. creating new consumers which allows the whole economy to grow, required more people to be hired to service the new customer growth.

No president controls this. No president can control this. Regulation or deregulation simply changes the rules...the economy just has to adapt.

That said, I feel the wealth gap is a more serious problem than we realize. A few people with a lot of wealth can do great economic damage. This is because the concept of monopolies don't exist for citizens. There should be regulations on how citizens can spend their money. I've personally seen wealthy people buy up apartments and houses spike the price well out of the local norm and playing with housing prices this way can destroy people, destroy familes. It should be regulated.

I am the financial controller of a medium-sized company in the Midwest. I became interested in this after realizing the economic impact of Trump's tax cut to businesses that went into effect for 2018. As a result of his cuts, my company saved nearly $3 million in tax expense in a single year. As a result of that, we were able to expand operations, hire 16 new employees, and give just about everyone between a 5 and 7% pay increase.

So I would kinda have to disagree with your conclusion that Presidents can't/don't impact the economy. In fact, fiscal and monetary policy (over which the President exerts considerable control and influence) are key macroeconomic factors that are studied in B schools around the world, and they most definitely have an economic impact.

Still, having said this, I think Trump is a bad human being, a lousy President, and just a piece of shit in general. But I cannot deny the boost he has given to not only my company, but thousands of other companies across the nation. If you think his tax cuts did not have an impact on unemployment, then you should probably consider learning more about the topic.

However, I do agree with you 100% that the income and wealth gaps are a real problem. And I agree with you that there isn't a whole lot any President can do about them, either.

1

I’m not finding it explained often enough … which is no doubt why trump tosses out crazy shit on a daily, if not hourly basis..

The deeper the Recession/ Depression - the longer the Recovery. We are riding the Obama Recovery - while trump desperately attempts to kill it - along with everything else ‘Obama.’

trump is a financial idiot, a conman. He’ll wreck our economy as fast and completely as he has his own.

Varn Level 8 May 10, 2019

His fiscal policy is unsustainable. But I would hardly credit Obama with the recovery from the 2008 financial collapse. In fact, Obama authorized trillions of dollars of "quantitative easing" (read: bail outs for Wall Street and banks - the very scumbags who deliberately orchestrated the financial meltdown 11 years ago).

If "anyone" deserves the blame, it is the SEC andbank regulators who knew all about the house of cards built on mortgage-backed securities and credit default swaps. And it was also under Obama's admin that Congress quitely repealed the part of Dodd-Frank that prohibited banks from dealing in derivitaves trading - the very thing that caused the 2008 financial collapse. So, in my book, Obama doesn't deserve credit for anything related to the recovery. In fact, his fiscal policies almost certainly stalled the recovery.

@Piratefish Obama salvaged our economy while burning his political capital providing us a semblance of health care. Bush Jr and friends allowed the banks to set us up for the fall, not Obama. Obama saved what was necessary, in a measured way. Seen trump going after any financial institutions lately?

Obama had two years of same-party rule in congress - and six years of Republican intransigence. And if you can’t give credit to Obama ..then give it to ‘need.’ Need built for years, during the greatest recession/ depression of my lifetime. For around the last six years, fixing the nation’s infrastructure and logistical needs have continued. It will end, it always does, but it will likely end much sooner and harder with trump in charge.

Interesting spin, though: economy just fine under bush jr. Obama blamed for everything, and trump doing ‘well’ due to continued unemployment? Yes, we’re employed, at near slave wages…

@Varn It's pretty obvious you don't understand much about macroeconomic principles or business at all. Where did you go to school? What is your degree? What is your professional experience in finance and economics?

On the other hand, your political party allegiance is pretty obvious.

@Piratefish Rarely delve into micro anything … it clouds the larger picture. You’re obviously looking for a playmate, I’m not him 😉 go fish ~

Edit - macro to micro ~

@Varn It is macroeconomics we're talking about. Not micro. You really don't have a clue.

I bet you are the kind of person who reads an article on new medical research in The Reader's Digest, and then suddenly thinks he knows as much about medicine and health as a doctor.

Your lack of an informed, educated, intelligent response to my very valid questions about your qualifications as an economics expert only supports my hunch that you wouldn't even score a 6 on the TUCE.

2

Just substitute the term "gliorified slave labor" for "jobs", and you'll have a pretty good indication of what we've been dealing with over the last thirty years or so in regards to jobs under Republican leadership.

The only difference between a Republican jobs plan and slave labor is that in slave labor the land owner provides a slum on their plantation for the slaves to live in. Under a Republican jobs plan, the land owner supplies a small stipend to the slaves so they'll go live in a slum somewhere else.

Realistically, our nation has lived too high on the hog for ..a good century. Naturally we’ll have to come into balance with the consumption of the world ..or we’ll have nothing left.

What irks me though are the Corporate Fat Cats making umpteen times more than their workers/ slaves. And yes, the (I wanna say god damn!) Republicans are making it so - and cheering them on!

Republicans .... Democrats .... they both work for the same people. Both have had plenty of chances to change things if they really wanted to, yet, here we are, with everything still the same.

2

Unemployment has gone down, but you can buy less things and cannot buy a house and hardly rent with the minute salaries they pay, as you say. Then again as Funnygirl mentioned, it is Obama who pulled us out of the fuck-up Bush created.

Bush didn't create the financial collapse in 2008, and Obama didn't rescue us from it.

A weak and apathetic SEC and banking regulators led to the fiasco. All Obama did was provide trillions in "quantitative easing" (read: bank and Wall Street bailouts). Also, while Obama was in office, Congress quietly repealed the parts of Dodd-Frank that prohibited banks from engaging in derivatives trading - the very thing that caused the 2008 collapse. And Obama let it go unchallenged.

So I must respectfully and politiely disagree with the conclusion that Obama rescued us, or that Bush caused the collapse. It's just plain inaccurate.

4

Not his victory. He's riding Obama's coat tails. [forbes.com]

I am the financial controller of a medium-sized company in the Midwest. I became interested in this after realizing the economic impact of Trump's tax cut to businesses that went into effect for 2018. As a result of his cuts, my company saved nearly $3 million in tax expense in a single year. As a result of that, we were able to expand operations, hire 16 new employees, and give just about everyone between a 5 and 7% pay increase.

Still, having said this, I think Trump is a bad human being, a lousy President, and just a piece of shit in general. But I cannot deny the boost he has given to not only my company, but thousands of other companies across the nation. If you think his tax cuts did not have an impact on unemployment, then you should probably consider learning more about the topic.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:344377
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.