So, whats better having small property with most of the things you need, water ,arable soil, shade, the works,but restricted and near high populations and nuclear plants. Or a lot of property , a ways away from anything and no restriction. In the us, fir now. Any suggestions? Or experience to share?
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
2 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.I live on a heavily wooded acre on a lake 28 miles from a city and 9 miles from a mid-sized town. I have lots of restrictions but they're Common Sense ones as far as I'm concerned and they protect me and my neighbors. I feel I have the best of both worlds. I would have it even better if I was still able to do all the yard work that's needed. I'm gradually acquiring lithium battery garden tools which means I will no longer have to crank up weed wackers and push mowers. I plan on finding the money for a DR battery powered wheeled trimmer soon which should solve my yard care problem. In other words the answer depends on your personal abilities and adaptability.
Lorajay
Level 9
June 6, 2019
0
Just to say the nuclear deal is a game changer
Danvstheworld
Level 4
June 6, 2019
1
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.