Agnostic.com

1 2

The Tea Party and today's right-wing libertarian movements are built on several premises or assumptions. Within limits, most of those are true. But the problem is that those current movements do not accept reasonable limits. Among those premises or assumptions are the following:

  1. Government closest to the people governs best. When that local government is built upon a culture which supports democratic principles and on the well-being of all the people, that tends to be true. When the culture is built on racism or ethnocentrism, unfettered free enterprise turn into greed, and ethnic, political, and economic inequity, local government acts in corrupt, despotic, and even brutally cruel ways.
  2. Concern for the poor is and should be the domain of the church. Where they get that from is incomprehensible. Nowhere in the Old Testament , New Testament, or Koran is that stated, and especially not by Jesus. What Jesus said is that WE should be concerned about the needs and plight of the poor. Nowhere did he say that we should not engage in combined efforts through government to deal with those concerns!!!!
  3. Man is a rational actor and when individuals are free to pursue -- without any restrictions -- their enlightened self-interest, the economy and society work best. The only problem is that the premise is simply not true. The human being, all too often, acts on emotion (greed, excessive exuberance, fear, desire for control) instead of reason. Limits must be placed on individuals and groups to prevent them from taking actions which hurt many innocent bystanders.
  4. Individual and states' rights take precedence over the federal government. Far too many individuals expressing the rights of the individuals are simply seeking opportunity to steal, embezzle, dominate, or control without limits and without regard to the rights and welfare of others. Similarly, acting on supposed states' rights has long been the domain of racists, militarists, corrupt politicians, and, other scoundrels.
    In short, today's right-wing libertarian movements are built on false premises. They seek to hamstring any government control which can truly (1)promote a more democratic country, real economic opportunity for all, the well-being of all our people, (2)rein in corruption, greed, fraud, and embezzlement, and (serve our people and country best. They, simply put, are immoral frauds!
wordywalt 9 July 19
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

You've done a good job outlining the limitations of Libertarianism. Many in the Liberatarian camp reference Ayn Rand and the Objectivism movement as their guide posts. Most do not understand human nature, or Ayn Rand for that matter.

Ayn Rand was writiing out of her experiences in Soviet Russia. As such she wrote in a polar extreme to the failing Communist system she fled. I did an independent study on her and her philosophies in college many years ago.

The problem lies in the fact most proponents of Objectivism and Libertarianism today are writing or espousing without to benefit of the same experiential base or context. They are grabbing onto a surficial undetstanding of what Rand meant by selfishness.

Todays Libertarianism is primarily a clarion call for superselfishness. It is principally a way to achieve two objectives:

  1. Preserve white male (primarily) privilige. The idea that basically says that nobody can tell me who I have to accept, what I can do, or that I need to be accountable to anybody besides myself (they just don't want to called into account for their actions or be responsible for contributing to the larger community):

  2. They are generally immature and recoil when they are told they have to contribute to society or provide assistance to anybody besides themselves. They are the type that were continually in trouble in school because they were convinced that nobody could tell them what to do.

Libertarianism is indeed a selfish minor philosophy, but not in the way that is consistent with Ayn Rand's experiences or intent. The above discriptions are indeed generalizations, but are anecdotally consistent with my observations and experiences.

Source:

,

t1nick Level 8 July 19, 2019
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:376395
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.