The vast majority of the climate models the IPCC uses as the basis for its predictions have repeatedly incorrectly forecast higher temperatures. According to an analysis by the Cato Institute, 105 of the 108 models predicted a higher surface temperature for the period between 1998 and 2014 than the temperature actually recorded.
βThe IPCC reports have been read in a similar way to the Bible: you try to find certain pieces or sections from which you try to justify your extreme views. This resembles religious extremism,β Taalas said.
uh huh, gave up religion but still need to believe strongly in something, even though similar strong faith is required? either that or total ignorance of a complicated issue will suffice.
ZeroHedge a good example of an organization that tries to find certain pieces or sections from which you try to justify their extreme views. This resembles religious extremism,
i don't try to justify anything. but i do know that if every govt jumps on board the global warming express in order to raise revenues ( in canada $1000. per household) i'm dubious.
why the fck would you trust governments, any govt.
@callmedubious I didn't say anything about governments. I don't trust shitty grifting websites that only exist to confirm the biases of crackpot conspiracy theorists.
@AlPastor ,
OK, got it. everything that supports global warming is automatically true & the 100s of scientists (including Nobel Laureates)who have raised questions about it are crackpot conspiracy theorists.
@callmedubious LOL I didn't say that either.