Agnostic.com

6 6

I'm so tired of seeing stories about hunters grinning like imbeciles over their kill. This story makes me feel a lot better. You gotta love karma.

[allthatsinteresting.com]

TheoryNumber3 8 Oct 7
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

trophy hunters are despicable, cowardly assholes with too much money.

I couldn't have said it better myself

1

Thanks for posting ... Stories of animals exacting poetic justice against their killers cheered me up, especially when poachers were eaten, gored, squashed, or trampled.

Now that's a fair fight!

1

I always tell these big bad hunters that if one deer shot back the hunt would be over.

Exactly. It's not exactly sporting to shoot an unsuspecting animal from 200 yds away using an assault rifle with a telephoto lens. Big heroes.

2

Fifteen feel good stories in one morning. Thanks for this post. Unless you live in a wilderness area living off of the land or you are protecting live stock from predators, hunting is for cowards and pussies! I love it when the animals strike back.

0

In the article Scott Van Zyl is identified as a crocodile poacher. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Van Zyl was a professional hunting guide. Also the article lumps together trophy hunting and poaching as though they were the same.

It is a deeply flawed article IMO. Before taking all that glee in the death of the hunter, be aware that two crocodiles were legally killed in searching for Van Zyl’s body.

I don't care if it's a hunter or a poacher. Both are reprehensible to me. They lack any sort of human compassion. You must be a hunter.

@TheoryNumber3 I grew up hunting and I have hunted on and off over the years. Why is the idea so reprehensible to you? Humans have hunted throughout their evolution over millions of years. And we raise livestock for food also. I think it’s safe to say that without hunting none of us would exist, you included.

@WilliamFleming I am a conscious vegetarian and an animal lover and I don't tell anyone what to eat, but that bogus justification about eating what you kill is just a sad and weak excuse for someone who enjoys killing animals for "the rush". Whether or not you eat them afterwards is irrelevant to me. You could easily go to a grocery store and buy your dinner, but you enjoy killing your food. That's the part that i can't get past. That you enjoy killing animals.

Sorry. I don't buy your argument that we wouldn't exist without hunting. Some of the strongest, and most powerful animals on this planet are vegetarians. Gorillas! Elephants! Giraffes! Hippopotamuses! Horses! All vegetarians. Including the ones you eat... chickens, cows, pigs. They're vegetarians too.

@TheoryNumber3 Chickens eat insects. Does the life of a bug matter? Pigs are omnivores and will eat almost anything. Our closest animal cousins, chimpanzees, sometimes eat each other.

Actually you make a good point. There is enjoyment for me in going on a hunt, but the actual kill gives me no pleasure. I make no judgments though about others because hunting is in our blood and people will be people. I see that cats enjoy torturing mice. That must give you a lot of angst.

@altschmerz Ha, I go nowhere. That’s not me. I did kill a deer a couple of years ago on my own property.

Sport hunting is highly regulated and you can bet that it is not permitted to kill endangered animals.

@altschmerz As I said above, it is a deeply flawed article, attempting to link Van Zyl with criminal poachers. He was a professional guide, not a poacher.

Apparently a fair number of local people are eaten by crocodiles.

[dailymail.co.uk]

@altschmerz Well, it’s in our blood to hunt and it’s what some people want to do. It’s part of the human heritage. Those hunts are highly regulated. I saw it in Alaska. Sometimes there are too many moose, bears, etc. and it is permitted to take some of them. In many cases a lot of those animals would die anyway. Wildlife managers look at overall populations and try to make decisions that benefit the entire ecosystem.

Nature is not concerned with individual organisms, animal or human. If you are going to continuously bemoan the death of individuals you’ll live a life of sorrow. It is more realistic and happy to take an overall view of life and identify with the whole process or continuum. After all, our own bodies are fragile and temporary also.

@WilliamFleming It may be in your blood but it isn't in mine nor millions of other people's. And that is he problem I have with it. The mentality that says it's ok to take a life, any life, at one's whim and then to hang its head on the wall as a testament to one's "manhood" is just despicable.

@WilliamFleming, @altschmerz Yes! We've all seen the pictures of some jackass standing over a dead rhino, giraffe or elephant and grinning like he did something praiseworthy

1

I will take the story with a pinch of salt perhaps. But you also have to remember that the poachers are often very poor, desperate people, who are pushed into it by wealthy dealers and smuggling gangs, Who target people who are in debt, need to fund health care or are even hungry, paying them tiny amounts and pressuring them with threats. And it is the wealthy and powerful gangs who really make money , hardly ever get caught, and don't ever walk long distances in the hot sun carrying heavy weights, or live in fear of animals, or the guns of wardens.

I have no sympathy for anyone who goes out and intentionally brings down a magnificent animal for his or her own glorification. They call it a sport.... ok... these guys lost. It was a fair fight. They got what they had coming.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:411282
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.