Agnostic.com

3 0

Extradite or NOT?
It is obvious to me that DT cannot deal with Human reason or emotion in thinking that he can bring two grieving women together before Justice is done. The only concept one has of Justice is with your own mother country and this means that the American mother MUST come to the UK before any further progress is made.

Really this all puts me off ANY dealer or dealings including BREXIT. I would much rather have a dialogue with someone who “ KNOWS HIS/HER STUFF( especially human needs) ”

Mcflewster 8 Oct 16
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

It seems to me that the Pres has too many fingers and too many pies. Doesn’t a department deal with this sort of interaction.

1

There have been incidents like that in the U.S. About ten years back, an Arab diplomat's kid killed a pedestrian with his $100,000 sports car, and got off via 'diplomatic immunity'. A few years before that, a Brazilian diplomat's kid raped and murdered a young woman in Washington D.C. He then hightailed it back to Brazil, untouchable, because of 'diplomatic immunity'. The thing to do, is to abolish 'diplomatic immunity'. If we can't commit crimes in other peoples' countries, without having to answer for it, why should diplomats and their families be immune from prosecution?

1

Definitely extradite. Diplomatic immunity be damned. I would call that an abuse of the privilege, especially in a case of what is at the very least manslaughter.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:414657
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.