Agnostic.com

2 6

Research published in Current Biology shows that people with radical beliefs have metacognition problems; they are unaware of their own beliefs, so unable to recognize the errors in their thinking. There's little use arguing with them.

I have a policy of suppressing a smile and changing the subject when religious GOP nuts are holding forth, and often advise others on this forum to do the same.

But tonight I myself became confrontational with my oldest brother, a tall, wealthy, nuclear physicist, who's also religious and a Trumpite.

When he began expressing Conservative views, mocking me when I countered with facts, I tore him a new one, but he laughed and called counter arguments "fake news."

I told him he was living in a white, Protestant, hetero, male privilege bubble..for instance, nobody had ever taken a shot at him for being black, or groped him at work for being a woman.

But I added there was no use talking to him because he never read anything or watched the news, so didn't know anything.
Then I went for a hike with my little rescue dog to cool off. I'm the one who felt angry, but he didn't care at all.

So, I proved the wisdom of my own advice..just ignore religious fanatics, since they lack the metacognition ability to grasp their errors in thinking.

[culturacolectiva.com]

birdingnut 8 Oct 28
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I just go with what Billy Joel said, you should never argue with a crazy man man man, you ought to know by now. I long ago gave up trying to understand radical views one way or the other, I try to stick with provable facts.

1

Metacognition is supposed to be taught in public high school curriculum. I do wonder whether it actually is taught in radical conservative areas. That is, I wonder whether enough teachers in those areas even understand what metacognition is. I also agree that radical liberals (neo liberals?) can be as unaware of the errors in their own thought processes as radical conservatives.

Metacognition isn't taught. Children reach a critical development level where they become aware of their own thought processes...usually starting around 12 years old, but sometimes never obtained, as in the case of fanatics of any stripe, according to the study.

For example, elementary school essays about what students did over the summer tend to be lists of activities, like "We went to the beach," or "We went to the Grand Canyon in July."

But around the fifth grade on, I start seeing papers where children are writing about their emotional reactions to what they experienced..not just that they "saw" the Grand Canyon" but that it was "awesome" and "scary," and/or so deep they were afraid to hike the trails, etc..

@birdingnut
Thanks for reminding me.
I'd prefer to have said metacognition is stimulated or allowed to happen rather than taught.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:419595
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.