Agnostic.com

4 2

Came across this and found it interesting. Thought many here would be intrigued and curious as to what you think?

[scientificamerican.com]

Norman347 5 Nov 8
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Sigh. Yet another cognitive failure getting unwarranted "air time".

0

The moment I saw the word "Templeton" I knew religion was involved and I stopped reading.

0

OK so he has set up the usual straw man of a hard atheist, so what. There are a couple of million people in that line ahead of him. And he is kind of in a round about way saying that that represents all atheists, without actually saying so, which is not new either. And then he is kissing the feet of a few theists for a massive cash prize. Even I would do that. Then it seems he is letting everyone thing that the prize he won was for physics, not the Templeton prize. So it seems that he may not be great at physics, but he is very good at dishonesty.

0

I read this back in March. I think most atheists would agree with "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”, but that's not the whole story.

(this is not the whole story either)
[en.wikipedia.org]

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:423916
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.