Agnostic.com

1 1

The analysis from HillTV is pretty good, imo. While the "issue" over Warren/Bernie's conversation is nonsensical (nothing in Bernie's history would make Warren's claim believable) one can not simply dismiss it. We don't know what's having an effect and what is garbage so the garbage must be addressed. Anyway, this is a full debate analysis and they had most of it right.
Poll question: Who do you believe in the Warren/Bernie dust up?
<iframe src="[facebook.com]; width="560" height="407" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media" allowFullScreen="true"></iframe>

  • 0 votes
  • 4 votes
rainmanjr 8 Jan 15
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

Warren was my second choice. After this desperate backstabbing, there is no second choice.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:449553
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.