Agnostic.com

5 6

Too good to be true? [goodnewsnetwork.org]

Allamanda 8 Mar 5
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Carbon Monoxide doesn't sound like a healthy byproduct.

0

I am far from qualified to judge these claims and skrpticsl because the author's qualifications are unknown to me.

0

Fascinating, hopeful way to reverse CO2 ... I just hope it is really true.

1

It does actually seem too good to be true... we who don’t believe in miracles and are natural sceptics are wary of such claims...as “if it seems too good to be true, then it usually isn’t true” !

0

. . . seems like only 33 million investment is not a large bet for the stated benefits.

@Allamanda The article/video mentions outputs of Syngas (%90) and stone -- no CO2.

@Allamanda 4000 degrees F, inject O2 and steam.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:467207
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.