@Mcflewster I do believe global level organization is most definitely indeed needed to facilitate large scale pushing in the right direction - freedom, human rights, envionmental, anti-poverty, medical standards, along those lines. But to say one world government has the final say, absolutely NOT. People are different all over the world and deserve their own sovereignty within limits. I am not nearly as knowledgeable in the workings of all of this in present day, but I do see huge failings in terms of what we should be capable of at this point in time in large scale and the reality of what we are actually doing.

Let's take one issue, covid. I have heard so many different contentions regarding the virus and really you don't know what to believe. Suspicion abounds. Some blame China, others get blamed, who knows ultimately? But I do believe the global leadership could have done much more and I also feel highly critical of the US response. When you look at all the money that has been poured in this very area over time and we are so UNPREPARED. I just really wonder, REALLY WONDER. I would say it's Trump fault, but initial Democrat response was much worse! They said protecting the nation from the virus was RACIST! If you can believe people would actually use that in a false manner! There are fixable problems both internal (to US) and external (to the world). And there are CERTAINLY actions that should and must be taken to improve the effectiveness of these very important organizations that should be trying to solve them.

But back to your question, the original set of questions. I don't really have an answer for it. I don't know that there would ever be one savior. People have to check and balance each other. It has to be ethical. I think the key is ethics in leadership at all tiers. Oaths. Holding the oath sacred.