Actually blacks, with their actions, are saying that blacks are better then whites because their lives matter more than anyone else. By this, they are no better than the white supremacists.

Good points. Where is that happening? The BLM and Antifa movements are not doing that.

@PBuck0145

First off, Antifa is an umbrella term of several uncoordinated, unaffiliated left wing groups. There is no one cohesive, centrally organized group known as Antifa (as per Bill Barr at his Congressional hearing).

Second there is a social movement, which includes BLM, the umbrella Antifa and others that are beginning to impact the way that people of color are seen. It has been going on for quite a while as can be seen with the number of strong, black female candidates that are holding office presently, or have recently held office. The killing of George Flydy just temporarily galvanized the movement and brought in peoples of non-color. The number of supporters (not all of them were along for the shits and giggles) of non-color that gave their voice to the movement is indicative of a social current that is changing in the country.

Paradigm shifts take time. The tipping point can come quickly (like the killing of George Floyd), but the actual change takes a while to realize.

@t1nick Interesting. Do you think that re-education camps like the following will help?

@PBuck0145

First, i do not believe him and his spiel. Second, she is an alt-right "accidental political commentator" (see pic below, it comes from her personal website). This is rather an insult to real commentators. She has a PhD in Industrial/Organizational Psychology,

Her claim to fame is going to a trump rally and writing about it. I do not find her credible and rather a sensationalist as opposed to a serious commentator.

Christopher Rufo, taken from: (he too is a sensationalist):

[medium.com]

"In the screenshot above, The Seattle Times establishes that while addiction and mental health are significant issues, the one thing in common between all homelessness people is poverty. This runs contrary to the story Rufo has been trying to push for years, that in fact we don’t need more resources to address homelessness, we just need to re-establish the bonds between families, churches, and communities (Rufo is a fellow at Discovery Institute, a creationist think-tank, in case you’re curious where this all stems from). So in an attempt to salvage his absurd claims, he decides to apply his amazing skills as a statistical analyst and prove to us once and for all that we can solve the homelessness crisis without addressing poverty."

"That Rufo doesn’t understand this very basic definition, or its inadequacy here in explaining the link between poverty and homelessness, is disqualifying and shows not just that Rufo shouldn’t be taken seriously, but that he shouldn’t be taking part in the conversation at all. This is a pattern for Rufo, who trotted out similarly ridiculous statistics on KUOW last week without being challenged, and who published a faux-academic paper on homelessness that is laughably sourced from start to finish. In short, Christopher Rufo is an idiot and if you take him seriously then you are also an idiot."

This is what I think of them. Check your sources next time, please.

@t1nick The violence NEEDS TO BE STOPPED!