Agnostic.com

1 1

Resistance to Hatred Might Reelect Trump

"President Trump might be reelected because of a silent majority’s resistance to hatred.

It was Caitlin Flanagan, writing in May 2017 in The Atlantic, who put us onto the irony of a victory through such resistance. The title of her piece said it all: “How Late-Night Comedy Fueled the Rise of Trump: Sneering Hosts Have Alienated Conservatives and Made Liberals Smug.” She observed that the public saw the comic mocking of the “deplorables” by “HBO, Comedy Central, TBS, ABC, CBS, and NBC. In other words, they see exactly what Donald Trump has taught them: that the entire media landscape loathes them, their values, their family, and their religion.”

In January 2019 Flanagan, again in The Atlantic, directed this same point at the New York Times: “You were partly responsible for the election of Trump because you are the most influential newspaper in the country, and you are not fair or impartial. Millions of Americans believe you hate them and that you will casually harm them. Two years ago, they fought back against you, and they won.”

Flanagan then added: “If Trump wins again, you will once again have played a small but important role in that victory.”

The poet T. S. Eliot once made a similar point about the casual harm that Flanagan cited: “Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm—but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.”"

[independent.org]

WilliamCharles 8 Sep 30
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

That's complete nonsense.. Trump was elected because racists voted for him period... Don't blame it on others...

That's a very one dimensional analysis. The racists always vote for the conservative republican, that's a given.

If you're not willing to consider the idea that there may be more blame to go around than just that placed on the racists who voted for him, you will never understand why the deplorables won in 16.

@RoboGraham blame? You wanna blame people, who didn't vote for trump, because trump was elected? So I guess if we want trump gone. Ummmm. We should vote for him? You're living in : Bizarro world... ...

@Cutiebeauty

I'm not voting for Trump yet there's plenty of blame coming my way for helping Trump. All those people who didn't vote for Trump and did vote for Jill Stein got plenty of blame. How do you explain that?

There's plenty of blame on the democrats for Trump's win. The establishment shut down a very popular candidate in favor of a very powerful and well connected candidate who was much despised. The Clinton campaign intentionally elevated Trump in the republican primary because they believed he was a joke who couldn't possibly win. They pressured their media outlets to cover Trump relentlessly and to portray him as the star of the primary. They encouraged people in open primary states to vote in the republican primary for Trump to aid him in winning the republican nomination.

Clinton also neglected to campaign in the rust belt states, naively assuming they would of course go blue, and the result was the loss of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin. In addition, she latched onto neoliberal policy which caused the economic decline of those areas and has harmed the working class for decades. This allowed Trump to swoop in and dazzle struggling working class people with his false promises of bringing back the jobs and increasing manufacturing and mining productivity. Clinton promised those people nothing but more of the same policies which had left them behind and impoverished.

Then there's the smug attitude of liberals which is the subject of this post by @Williamcharles. The elitist belittling and teasing of conservatives, though funny and entertaining, turns many traditionalist voters away from the democrats.

You are living in a low information world. You seriously only have a surface level understanding of American politics. I encourage you to dig deeper and open up your mind.

@RoboGraham
"...did vote for Jill Stein got plenty of blame. How do you explain that?"

Seriously.. They did it to you so you do it to them? Grow up... Be an adult.. I can't explain nonsense...

And just because I disagree doesn't mean

I'm ".. living in a low information world. You seriously only have a surface level understanding of American politics. I encourage you to dig deeper and open up your mind."

You lack logical thinking skills...

@Cutiebeauty

"You wanna blame people, who didn't vote for trump, because trump was elected?" You asked the question and I told you how lots of people who didn't vote for Trump get the blame. I'd like to put the blame on the non-Trump voters who actually deserve blame. They didn't reflect on what happened last time, they haven't learned from their mistakes and they are running the same failed strategy again. This is worrying. Those who are in need of growing up are the people who are unwilling to consider this.

"And just because I disagree doesn't mean..." Correct. You have a surface level understanding of politics, not because you disagree with me, but because you have consistently proven yourself to have very little information, very little of anything substantive to add to any discussion, and when people attempt to inform you of anything deeper than your surface level understanding, it goes right over your head. I have political discussions with all sorts of people I disagree with and nearly all of them have a deeper understanding than you do. Even republicans are often able to show that they are better informed than you are.

Logical thinking skills? You don't recognize them when they are right in your face because you have none yourself.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:539356
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.