Agnostic.com

2 1

Why is it that you can be drafted into "serving your country" for the military but you can't be drafted to serve your country as a politician?

redbai 8 Jan 31
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I suspect there would be both advantages and drawbacks. I would not want resentful draftees in influential positions.
However, the status quo is also awful we need to overturn the disastrous Citizens United SCOTUS ruling, kick corporate lobbyists out of the picture and revamp campaign finance dramatically to restrict it to largely public funding. I would also copy Ireland's "democracy 2.0" system of elections None of this is likely to happen, of course, because powerful interests will never let go of their privileged influence. 😣

I don't see how it any less dangerous than drafting a psychopath who finds that they love killing in the military? Given the same lengths of term and a new draft to fill all positions in each cycle, no single politician would be in power long enough to garner enough political power to be powerfully dangerous. It would also make it pretty much mandatory for every to receive a competent education because anyone could end up in any position and would need the ability to be competent in that work. It would also complicate lobbying as large companies would have no idea who to groom or pay money to in order to gain influence. It would also get rid of the need for party politics.

I don't see a downside that is any worse than the status quo.

@redbai Re. Military draft, I completely agree. But I also don't support a draft system, and we have not had a draft since Vietnam. Selective services registration at this point is going through the motions. The military brass WANTS volunteers over draftees. Why? Competence. It is too inefficient to have to keep training new replacements for these high tech positions the modern military depends on. Government arguably is similarly vulnerable. Political Congressional aids are indespensible as it is. They are sometimes the only ones keeping ceryain Congressional reps afloat.
Re. Government competence and civics education, I can't picture some people ever being competent, regardless their education. I also have difficulty trusting that said necessary education would be provided broadly, sad to say.
But I still agree there is nothing about the current system to ensure competence, and we certainly have some alarming domestic terrorist-sympathizing, science-denying, theocracy-promoting yahoos in now who clearly don't beling in government.
I don't have the answers, but the one thing we know about elected officials now is that they volunteered and so presumably are motivated. Maybe if we can eliminate the motivation of shameless corporate lobbyist money, some of the "swamp" element that discourages other competent would-be public servants from seeking office could be reduced.

0

Government by jury. It has been suggested before.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:573169
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.